CH391L/S13/Mechanosensing

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 8: Line 8:
High hydrostatic pressure (HHP) can cause a host of problems, including dissociation of multimeric proteins, shifts in reaction equilibria, loss of membrane integrity, and  protein denaturation (reviewed in <cite>biotechapplications</cite>). In some cases, changes in mechanical stress result in differential gene expression driven by mechanosensitive promoters or repressors. Genes that have increased expression might include cold- and heat-shock and other stress response proteins<cite>stressprots</cite>, barostable polymerases<cite>RNApolviolacea</cite>, or membrane proteins<cite>OmpHdiscovery OmpIgene</cite>. Down-regulated genes might include nutrient transporters<cite>MalBinterval OmpLgene</cite>. In other cases, porin proteins which provide ion diffusion pathways are opened in response to osmotic stress across the membrane.
High hydrostatic pressure (HHP) can cause a host of problems, including dissociation of multimeric proteins, shifts in reaction equilibria, loss of membrane integrity, and  protein denaturation (reviewed in <cite>biotechapplications</cite>). In some cases, changes in mechanical stress result in differential gene expression driven by mechanosensitive promoters or repressors. Genes that have increased expression might include cold- and heat-shock and other stress response proteins<cite>stressprots</cite>, barostable polymerases<cite>RNApolviolacea</cite>, or membrane proteins<cite>OmpHdiscovery OmpIgene</cite>. Down-regulated genes might include nutrient transporters<cite>MalBinterval OmpLgene</cite>. In other cases, porin proteins which provide ion diffusion pathways are opened in response to osmotic stress across the membrane.
-
In addition to pressure-sensing promoters, many organisms have mechanosensitive channels which are involved in changing metabolism more quickly than transcriptional changes allow. One example of well-studied mechanosensitive channel protein is MscS <cite>MscSpaper</cite>. This protein forms a non-specific ion channel across the cell membrane in E. Coli which opens in response to osmotic changes in the environment. When the osmotic pressure across the membrane changes, MscS opens and allows ions and water to move across the membrane, which prevents cell lysis from osmotic pressure. Several other classes of mechanosensitive channels have been identified, which are generally classified by their size and the magnitude of pressure which elicits a response.
+
In addition to pressure-sensing promoters, many organisms have mechanosensitive channels which are involved in changing metabolism more quickly than transcriptional changes allow. One example of well-studied mechanosensitive channel protein is MscS (summarized in <cite>MscSpaper</cite>). This protein forms a non-specific ion channel across the cell membrane in E. Coli which opens in response to osmotic changes in the environment. When the osmotic pressure across the membrane changes, MscS opens and allows ions and water to move across the membrane, which prevents cell lysis from osmotic pressure. Several other classes of mechanosensitive channels have been identified, which are generally classified by their size and the magnitude of pressure which elicits a response.
==Mechanosensing in Prokaryotes==
==Mechanosensing in Prokaryotes==

Revision as of 16:18, 15 April 2013

back to main page

Contents

Introduction

Mechanosensing refers to the ability of an organism to respond to changes in mechanical force on them or their environment. The mechanical stress can be in a variety of forms:

  • Hydrostatic pressure, as in the case of deep ocean environments
  • Fluid shear stress, as in the case of blood flowing through veins
  • Direct force, as in the case of body weight on a bone
  • Osmotic pressure, resulting from a difference in solute concentrations across a semi-permeable membrane

High hydrostatic pressure (HHP) can cause a host of problems, including dissociation of multimeric proteins, shifts in reaction equilibria, loss of membrane integrity, and protein denaturation (reviewed in [1]). In some cases, changes in mechanical stress result in differential gene expression driven by mechanosensitive promoters or repressors. Genes that have increased expression might include cold- and heat-shock and other stress response proteins[2], barostable polymerases[3], or membrane proteins[4, 5]. Down-regulated genes might include nutrient transporters[6, 7]. In other cases, porin proteins which provide ion diffusion pathways are opened in response to osmotic stress across the membrane.

In addition to pressure-sensing promoters, many organisms have mechanosensitive channels which are involved in changing metabolism more quickly than transcriptional changes allow. One example of well-studied mechanosensitive channel protein is MscS (summarized in [8]). This protein forms a non-specific ion channel across the cell membrane in E. Coli which opens in response to osmotic changes in the environment. When the osmotic pressure across the membrane changes, MscS opens and allows ions and water to move across the membrane, which prevents cell lysis from osmotic pressure. Several other classes of mechanosensitive channels have been identified, which are generally classified by their size and the magnitude of pressure which elicits a response.

Mechanosensing in Prokaryotes

The first pressure-responsive gene in bacteria was found in 1989[4] in a deep-ocean bacterium, Photobacterium profundum strain SS9. The gene encodes for OmpH, a large transmembrane protein which is involved in nutrient uptake. Later work found that the operon also contained two outer membrane proteins, OmpL[7] (induced at lower pressures ~1atm) and OmpI[5] (induced at much higher pressures ~400atm). These pressure inducible genes were found to be essential for survival under HHP growth conditions[include a ref].


Mechanosensing in Eukaryotes

iGEM Connection

There is a brief mention of an idea regarding mechanosensing as an earthquake sensor in the notebook section for the 2012 Baskent University team, but it seems that they chose to pursue a different idea related to quorum sensing.

2010 MIT

In one of their projects, this team focused on engineering pressure sensitive promoters in mammalian cells. They were interested in using pressure as a way to control formation of biomaterials, with a goal of being able to engineer tissues and organs. Specifically, they created a touch pad which would form bone after a pressure change input. They first characterized fluid shear stress responsive promoters and used these to create a genetic toggle switch sensitive to pressure changes. Their touch pad contained human endothelial kidney (HEK) cells with production Bone Morphogenic Protein 2 (BMP2) under control of the pressure sensitive toggle switch, along with undifferentiated stem cells. When pressure is applied, BMP2 production turns on and causes the production of bone tissue via the differentiated stem cells.


2008 Tokyo Tech This team focused on creating a strain of E. Coli which could be used in a biologically-based touch screen device ("Coli Touch"). Their system applied the pressure-sensitive tet promoter to the expression of GFP. They created a device containing a thin film of cells with this construct, which resulted in the surface selectively fluorescing only in areas which had pressure applied. Since this promoter requires very high pressures (30 MPA according to their page), they also worked on using directed evolution to engineering a promoter which can respond at a lower pressure. In addition, they designed a genetic toggle switch would allow a user to "erase" any writing on the device by activating a heat-sensitive construct which represses GFP production. Beyond these experimental aspects of the project, they also developed a mathematical model which related the pressure input to fluorescence level in order to understand the limitations they needed to develop for an effective write/erase cycle using their "Coli touch" systems.

Future Directions

It's worth noting that extremely high pressure is gaining popularity as a way to pasteurize foods without heat treatment[1]. The high pressure takes less of a toll on the quality of the food products than heat, but can be just as effective at killing microorganisms. It will be interesting to see if baro-resistant organisms arise from this trend.

References

  1. Follonier S, Panke S, and Zinn M. . pmid:22290643. PubMed HubMed [biotechapplications]
  2. Ambily Nath IV and Loka Bharathi PA. . pmid:21210167. PubMed HubMed [stressprots]
  3. Nakasone K, Ikegami A, Fujii S, Kato C, and Horikoshi K. . pmid:11111034. PubMed HubMed [RNApolviolacea]
  4. Bartlett D, Wright M, Yayanos AA, and Silverman M. . pmid:2479840. PubMed HubMed [OmpHdiscovery]
    First discovery of bacterial pressure-regulated gene

  5. Chi E and Bartlett DH. . pmid:8244922. PubMed HubMed [OmpIgene]
  6. Sato T, Nakamura Y, Nakashima KK, Kato C, and Horikoshi K. . pmid:8598266. PubMed HubMed [MalBinterval]
  7. Welch TJ and Bartlett DH. . pmid:8759872. PubMed HubMed [OmpLgene]
  8. Naismith JH and Booth IR. . pmid:22404681. PubMed HubMed [MscSpaper]
  9. Morozkina EV, Slutskaia ES, Fedorova TV, Tugaĭ TI, Golubeva LI, and Koroleva OV. . pmid:20198911. PubMed HubMed [biotechreview]
All Medline abstracts: PubMed HubMed
Personal tools