CHE.496/2008/Responses: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
GMcArthurIV (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
GMcArthurIV (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Template:CHE.496/2008}} | {{Template:CHE.496/2008}} | ||
<div style="padding: 10px; width: 750px; border: 5px solid #B3CD4E;"> | <div style="padding: 10px; width: 750px; border: 5px solid #B3CD4E;"> | ||
==Responses to the reading assignments== | |||
Each student is expected to read and respond to each assigned article. The following responses include opinions on 1) what the main purpose of the article is, 2) what was the most important or interesting points made in the article, and 3) what concepts from the article can be applied toward the 2008 VGEM Team project. | |||
*[[CHE.496/2008/Responses/a4| '''Assignment 4 Responses]] | |||
* | *[[CHE.496/2008/Responses/a5| '''Assignment 5 Responses]] | ||
*[[CHE.496/2008/Responses/a6| '''Assignment 6 Responses]] | |||
*Assignment 5 Responses | *[[CHE.496/2008/Responses/a7| '''Assignment 7 Responses]] | ||
*Assignment 6 Responses | *[[CHE.496/2008/Responses/a8| '''Assignment 8 Responses]] | ||
*Assignment 7 Responses | *[[CHE.496/2008/Responses/a9| '''Assignment 9 Responses]] | ||
*Assignment 8 Responses | *[[CHE.496/2008/Responses/a10| '''Assignment 10 Responses]] | ||
*Assignment 9 Responses | *[[CHE.496/2008/Responses/a11| '''Assignment 11 Responses]] | ||
*Assignment 10 Responses | *[[CHE.496/2008/Responses/a12| '''Assignment 12 Responses]] | ||
*Assignment 11 Responses | *[[CHE.496/2008/Responses/a13| '''Assignment 13 Responses]] | ||
*Assignment 12 Responses | *[[CHE.496/2008/Responses/a14| '''Assignment 14 Responses]] | ||
*Assignment 13 Responses | *[[CHE.496/2008/Responses/a15| '''Assignment 15 Responses]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:01, 1 February 2008
Responses to the reading assignments
Each student is expected to read and respond to each assigned article. The following responses include opinions on 1) what the main purpose of the article is, 2) what was the most important or interesting points made in the article, and 3) what concepts from the article can be applied toward the 2008 VGEM Team project.
