CH391L/S13/Probiotics

From OpenWetWare

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Introduction

A probiotic (from the Latin, pro-, "in favor, for" and the Greek , biōtikós, "pertaining to life" refers to a live microorganism that provides a benefit to the host, either directly or indirectly, via interactions with the hosts cells or the host's microbiota. Although research for most of the last century focused on establishing the fundamentals of what a probiotic is, current research is aiming at characterizing the complex microbial communities found in on the human body and analyzing their roles in our health and disease [1]. An in depth exploration of probiotics as a way to treat disease will have its benefits, as its been shown by by methods such fecal transplantation in which a patient is treated for antibiotic-associated diarrhea[2]. Still, nowadays it is foods and probiotics that seem to dominate the general public's consciousness of what a probiotic is, as it still not seen as a way to prevent or treat disease in the same way a drug would.


Definition of a Probiotic Trough Time
Definition of a Probiotic Trough Time

Probiotics in Food

Probiotic foods defined by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organization in 2001 a food product that contains viable probiotic microorganisms in sufficient populations (at least 10^6 cfu/g) incorporated in a suitable matrix, for example a yogurt. Not only this but it must be able to maintain the viability and its metabolic activity through processing, consumption and survive the gastrointestinal tract. Several health benefits have been attributed to the ingestion of such foods, including treating alleviating lactose intolerance.[3][4]

The Media's Take on Probiotics

Provided below are two recent articles, one from NPR and the other from The Telegraph:

Advancements Towards Probiotic GMOs in Food

A Food Grade and Generally Recognized as Safe Organism (GRAS) is a classification applied by the US Food and Drug Administration due to its long time use in food products. Most of the Lactococcus lactis strains contain, a GRAS organism, contain multiple plasmids that encode traits important for the food industry. These traits include sugar utilization, bacteriocins, and bacteriophage resistance. Nowadays transfer of between these L. lactis strains occur via the method of bacterial conjugation. A second way to modify L. lactis, less common, is via what we know as molecular cloning of plasmids between GRAS strains, which has lead to the development of food grade vectors. A methodology used was isolating endogenous plasmids from L. lactis and separate isolation of useful markers from L. lactis strains that they could then put together into food grade expression vectors [5]

Probiotics: Exploring their Potential in Disease Prevention

A human's microbiota, is a complex system of microbe-microbe interactions and host-microbe interactions that allows an state of homeostasis, and when perturbed an state of dysbiosis ensues. Probiotics can alter a host's microbiome to move from the state of dysbiosis to homeostasis. Based on this we can suggest an ideal probiotic would try to achieve reestablishing the benefits in the context of a diet that includes a probiotic either as a supplement or a treatment to a disease. Nowadays this approach can take the form of a rudimentary fecal transplantation from diseased individuals to healthy ones. Their approach to treat antibiotic-associated diarrea caused by Clostridium difficile infection was to assessing patient to one of three treatments: 1) included a 4 day vancomycin treatment followed by a lavage and the infusion of donor fecal matter, 2)a vancomycin only treatment, or 3)a vancomycin treatment followed by a bowel lavage.From these the most successful was the fecal matter transplant from a healthy donor, and as the authors concluded happened to statistically correlate to an increase and change in the microbial diversity of the patient.

Another approach has been to genetically modify Streptococcus mutants by deleting lactate dehydrogenase gene and making it deficient in lactic acid production, as lactic acid can damage a person's enamel. In turn this same strain became an effector used to produce mutacin which provided a selective advantage to this strain of S. mutans versus the native strain. This S. mutans was then tested in gnotobiotic rats and observed not to have an effect on the indigenous flora except for other indigenous S. mutants strains that are associated with dental caries. [6]

Future applications of probiotics could involve using them as delivery systems to fight certain tumors, as explored with the use of Escherichia coli Nissile 1917. In an in vivo study performed in mice testing for tumor specific accumulation of this E. coli strain it was found to be a good shuttle system based on it's ability to successfully colonize tumors (measured as 1x10^8 cfu/g of tumor, in comparison with spleen tissue). More over it was also successful in showing growth conditions and arabinose induced gene activation. [7] Finally E.coli Nissile 1917 is one a generally recognized as safe (GRAS) organism known as Mutaflor.

Protecting a Gnotobiotic Animal from Disease by Reestablishing the Microbiota With The Use of a  Probiotic. Modified from Fuller's 1989 article: Probiotics in man and animals.
Protecting a Gnotobiotic Animal from Disease by Reestablishing the Microbiota With The Use of a Probiotic. Modified from Fuller's 1989 article: Probiotics in man and animals.

Oversight of Probiotics in the United States

Probiotics are currently regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)in one of the following ways; As a dietary supplement, in which case only a premarket notice to the FDA is necessary or as a drug in which case a premarketing safety, efficacy and approval by the FDA are required. Currently, most of the probiotics on the market fall under the umbrella of a dietary supplement, but situations where the number of infections and the severity of such cases are causing clinicians to evaluate their use as drug, as it's happening for Clostridium difficile infections. In such cases, Florastor (Saccharomyces boulardii) a probiotic currently marketed as a drug is beneficial as it demonstrated its efficacy in reducing the recurrence of C. difficile when used in combination with standard treatment methods. Although cases in which Florastor has lead to fungemia,yeast present in the blood, have been reported, mostly in patients that were not receiving the treatment via introduction of live yeast from contaminated hands of a technician to a catheter site. [8]

iGEM 2009: Stanford's Approach to Probiotics

The 2009 Stanford iGEM Team project centered on probiotics and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). IBD, as explained, is caused by an imbalance of two types of T-cells, Treg cells that immunosuppres the Th17 cells that cause the inflammation seen in patients. They suggest that an novel theraputic mechanism can be achieved by in vivo regulation of these cells. Their approach focuses in constructing two different Escherichia coli(E.coli) strains, each that would contain a distinct input/output cassette , each that is referred as a device. The first device would detect as input Nitric Oxide(NO), a byproduct of inflammation and Th17 proliferation, produces retinoic acid, that blocks further CD4+ T-cells differentiation into Th17 cells. The second device detects 5-Methyl tryptophan (5MT) as an input and produces Interleukin-6 to regulate Treg proliferation to regulate their immunosuppression response. Ideally depending on the balance between these two markers, if too much NO is sensed by Device 1 it would prevent inflammation. The opposite would also be true if the second device sences to much 5MT that would immunosuppress Th17 cell by blocking their differentiation.



References

  1. Gordon JI. . pmid:22674326. PubMed HubMed [Gordon2012]
  2. van Nood E, Vrieze A, Nieuwdorp M, Fuentes S, Zoetendal EG, de Vos WM, Visser CE, Kuijper EJ, Bartelsman JF, Tijssen JG, Speelman P, Dijkgraaf MG, and Keller JJ. . pmid:23323867. PubMed HubMed [Keller2013]
  3. T. Vasiljevic, N.P. Shah, Probiotics—From Metchnikoff to bioactives, International Dairy Journal, Volume 18, Issue 7, July 2008, Pages 714-728, ISSN 0958-6946, 10.1016/j.idairyj.2008.03.004.

    [Shah2007]

  4. Adriano G. Cruz, Adriane E.C. Antunes, Ana Lúcia O.P. Sousa, José A.F. Faria, Susana M.I. Saad, Ice-cream as a probiotic food carrier, Food Research International, Volume 42, Issue 9, November 2009, Pages 1233-1239, ISSN 0963-9969, 10.1016/j.foodres.2009.03.020.

    [Cruz2009]

  5. Liu CQ, Su P, Khunajakr N, Deng YM, Sumual S, Kim WS, Tandianus JE, and Dunn NW. . pmid:15610425. PubMed HubMed [Dunn2004]
  6. Hillman JD. . pmid:12369203. PubMed HubMed [Hillman2002]
  7. Stritzker J, Weibel S, Hill PJ, Oelschlaeger TA, Goebel W, and Szalay AA. . pmid:17448724. PubMed HubMed [Stritzker2007]
  8. Venugopalan V, Shriner KA, and Wong-Beringer A. . pmid:21029521. PubMed HubMed [Venugopalan2010]
  9. Borody TJ, Warren EF, Leis SM, Surace R, Ashman O, and Siarakas S. . pmid:15220681. PubMed HubMed [Borody2004]
  10. Kinross JM, Darzi AW, and Nicholson JK. . pmid:21392406. PubMed HubMed [Kinross2011]
  11. Bengmark S. . pmid:9505873. PubMed HubMed [Bengmark1998]
All Medline abstracts: PubMed HubMed
Personal tools