CH391L/S13/Biologically Inspired Materials

From OpenWetWare

< CH391L/S13(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Spider silk)
Current revision (15:02, 3 May 2013) (view source)
(Spider Silk)
 
(39 intermediate revisions not shown.)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:CH391L_S13]]
[[Category:CH391L_S13]]
-
While related to the field of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biomaterial biomaterials], biologically-inspired materials do not necessarily interact with biological systems in their ultimate application. Rather, biologically-inspired materials take the lessons of biological materials and apply them to construct complex composite materials to emulate the desired properties of a biological material. 
+
[[Image:Jesus-lizard-running-on-water-basilisk.jpg|thumb|right|500px|Biology is a rich source of inspiration for engineers. Here a basilisk lizard runs on water. [http://www.societyofrobots.com/robottheory/jesus_lizard_robot_paper.pdf]]]
-
=Introduction=
+
Biologically-inspired materials, not to be confused with the related field of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biomaterial biomaterials],  are any materials which have been engineered with lessons learned from nature. They do not necessarily interact with biological systems in their ultimate application. Rather, biologically-inspired materials use biological materials as models and engineers learn to construct complex composite materials to emulate the desired properties of a biological material. 
-
Biologically-inspired materials combine material science and biological structure. Material science involves the study of atomic structure and the interaction of elemental units to form composite substances with complex properties and high performance for many different technological applications.  Biological structures are naturally evolved materials that have been refined to serve specific functions in environmental niches.  Often times, the properties that make biological structures useful in their natural habitat also make these structures useful for human use.  For example, silk is impressively strong and tough, but extremely thin. This has made silk a valuable tool as a medical suture.  
+
=Background=
 +
 
 +
Biologically-inspired materials combine material science and biological structure. Materials science involves the study of atomic structure and the interaction of elemental units to form composite substances with complex properties and high performance for many different technological applications.  Biological structures are naturally evolved materials that have been refined to serve specific functions in environmental niches.  Often times, the properties that make biological structures useful in their natural habitat also make these structures useful for human use.  For example, silk is impressively strong and tough, but extremely thin. This has made silk a valuable tool as a medical suture.  
Biological structure can often be distinguished from traditional synthetic materials in that it usually displays the following characteristics<cite>Meyers2013</cite>:
Biological structure can often be distinguished from traditional synthetic materials in that it usually displays the following characteristics<cite>Meyers2013</cite>:
-
1. Self-Assembly <br>
+
<ol>
-
2. Multi-functionality <br>
+
<li>Self-Assembly</li>
-
3. Hierarchy <br>
+
<li>Multi-functionality</li>
-
4. Hydration <br>
+
<li>Hierarchy</li>
-
5. Mild synthesis conditions <br>
+
<li>Hydration</li>
-
6. Evolution and environmental constraints <br>
+
<li>Mild synthesis conditions</li>
-
7. Self-healing capability <br>
+
<li>Evolution and environmental constraints</li>
 +
<li>Self-healing capability</li>
 +
</ol>
Biological structures, like silk, achieve their material properties by controlling their molecular structure and composition.  This can result in materials with  
Biological structures, like silk, achieve their material properties by controlling their molecular structure and composition.  This can result in materials with  
-
1. High tensile strength, <br>
+
<ul>
-
2. High toughness, and <br>
+
<li>High tensile strength</li>
-
3. High bending resistance. <br>
+
<li>High toughness</li>
 +
<li>High bending resistance</li>
 +
</ul>
Often times, these materials are lightweight as well <cite>Meyers2013</cite>.
Often times, these materials are lightweight as well <cite>Meyers2013</cite>.
Line 28: Line 34:
The repurposing of refined biological structures has led to many useful products:
The repurposing of refined biological structures has led to many useful products:
 +
 +
[[Image:Velcro-e1315606382449.jpg | thumb | left | 200px | Burdock seed burrs inspired the invention of Velcro. [http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2011/09/velcro-was-modeled-after-burrs-of-the-burdock-plant-that-stuck-to-velcros-inventors-pants-after-a-hunting-trip/]]]
Velcro was inspired by plant burrs, self-cleaning surfaces <cite>Blossey2003</cite> were inspired by lotus leafs, and shark skin has inspired technology that reduces drag in pipelines, and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharklet_(material) Sharklet], which prevents bacterial colonization on medical devices in hospitals.
Velcro was inspired by plant burrs, self-cleaning surfaces <cite>Blossey2003</cite> were inspired by lotus leafs, and shark skin has inspired technology that reduces drag in pipelines, and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharklet_(material) Sharklet], which prevents bacterial colonization on medical devices in hospitals.
Line 35: Line 43:
While material scientists learn from nature and emulate biological structure using physics, chemistry, and nanotechnology, synthetic biologists have tried to re-purpose the genetic material of biological structures to recreate the component parts and molecular machinery necessary to scale up production of biological materials to industrial levels.  
While material scientists learn from nature and emulate biological structure using physics, chemistry, and nanotechnology, synthetic biologists have tried to re-purpose the genetic material of biological structures to recreate the component parts and molecular machinery necessary to scale up production of biological materials to industrial levels.  
-
Examples include spider silk, mussel adhesion protein, and barnacle cement. Here, a small number of gene products are responsible for a useful biological material; however, the amount of total product produced by an individual organism is small.  The difficulty of harvesting or maintaining a large numbers of these organisms makes it costly for use of the material commercially.  The small number of gene products does lead, however, to potentially producing these materials in non-native hosts.
+
Examples include spider silk, mussel adhesion protein, and barnacle cement. Here, a small number of gene products are responsible for a useful biological material; however, the amount of total product produced by an individual organism is small.  The difficulty of harvesting or maintaining large numbers of these organisms makes it costly for use of the material commercially.  The small number of gene products does lead, however, to potentially producing these materials in non-native hosts.
-
=Spider silk=
+
=Spider Silk=
 +
 
 +
[[Image:Shutterstock 71425879.gif | thumb | right | 300px| Spider silk is 4 microns thick. Fifteen times less than a human hair. [http://scienceillustrated.com.au/blog/nature/spider-silk-a-new-superconductor/]]]
One prime example of the effort to produce a valuable biological material at industrial scale is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spider_silk spider silk].
One prime example of the effort to produce a valuable biological material at industrial scale is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spider_silk spider silk].
Line 45: Line 55:
Spider silk has been proposed to be useful for surgical sutures, body armor, and artificial tendons and ligaments among other things.
Spider silk has been proposed to be useful for surgical sutures, body armor, and artificial tendons and ligaments among other things.
-
Spiders are typically capable of producing different kinds of silk with different material properties for different biological functions. Some spiders are capable of making seven different types of silk. Spider silk ranges from sticky, stretchy capture spiral silk to strong, tough major-ampullate (dragline) silk. Dragline silk, used for lifeline, is a typical target for industrial purposes.   
+
Spiders are typically capable of producing different kinds of silk with different material properties for different biological functions. Some spiders are capable of making seven different types of silk. Spider silk ranges from sticky, stretchy capture spiral silk to strong, tough major-ampullate (dragline) silk. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spider_silk#Types_of_silk Dragline silk] is a typical target for industrial purposes.   
-
The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_garden_spider European garden spider] (Araneus diadematus) and the golden orb-web spider, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nephila_clavipes Nephila clavipes], are two spiders whose silk genes have been studied extensively. The major silk genes in A. diadematus are ADF-3 and ADF-4, while in N clavipes, they are MaSpI and MaSpII.   
+
The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_garden_spider European garden spider] (<i>Araneus diadematus</i>) and the golden orb-web spider, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nephila_clavipes <i>Nephila clavipes</i>], are two spiders whose silk genes have been studied extensively. The major silk genes in <i>A. diadematus</i> are ADF-3 and ADF-4, while in <i>N. clavipes</i>, they are MaSpI and MaSpII.   
-
Industrial scale production of spider silk has been a longtime goal in the field.  Unlike silk worms (Bombyx mori), spiders are aggressive and territorial, which makes them difficult to domesticate and farm.  This has led to the pursuit of recombinant strategies. High production of recombinant spider silk proteins, however, has also been a challenge. Spider silk proteins are large (up to 15 Mbp) and highly repetitive at the sequence level.  Bacterial expression hosts have different codon uses and natural machinery that promotes recombination of repetitive sequences.  This has limited the production yields of natural spider silk in bacterial hosts <cite>Vendrely2007</cite>.  Multiple other hosts have been used including yeasts, plants, mammalian cells, insect cells, and transgenic animals <cite>Rising2011</cite>.  No system has proven ideal yet and each requires tradeoffs including cost, yield, and convenience. <cite>Widhe2012</cite>
+
Industrial scale production of spider silk has been a longtime goal in the field.  Unlike silk worms (<i>Bombyx mori</i>), spiders are aggressive and territorial, which makes them difficult to domesticate and farm.  This has led to the pursuit of recombinant strategies. High production of recombinant spider silk proteins, however, has also been a challenge. Spider silk proteins are large (up to 15 Mbp) and highly repetitive at the sequence level.  Bacterial expression hosts have different codon uses and natural machinery that promotes recombination of repetitive sequences.  This has limited the production yields of natural spider silk in bacterial hosts <cite>Vendrely2007</cite>.  Multiple other hosts have been used including yeasts, plants, mammalian cells, insect cells, and transgenic animals <cite>Rising2011</cite>.  Widmaier, <i>et al.</i> engineered a type III secretion system to export silk monomers designed for enhance stability and codon usage <cite>Widmaier2009</cite>. (Widmaier has a startup company called Refactored Materials trying to commercialize synthetic spider silk <cite>Fu2012</cite>.) No system has proven ideal yet and each requires tradeoffs including cost, yield, and convenience. <cite>Widhe2012</cite>
-
One particularly interesting approach to spider silk protein production was through transgenic goats. In the early 2000s, Jeffrey Turner and Paul Ballard, founders of Nexia Biotechnologies, were looking for a new product.  Randolph Lewis of the University of Wyoming had developed a method for introducing a gene of choice into a goat mammary tissue. Lewis licensed the technology to Nexia and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BioSteel BioSteel] was born. Nexia went public in the year 2000 to the largest Canadian IPO in history (at the time) at $42.4 million <cite> </cite>. Nexia ultimately never developed a commercially viable BioSteel product and the company went bankrupt in 2009. However, the resulting transgenic "spider goats" still remain. Two goats, Sugar and Spice, were sold to the Canada Agricultural Museum <cite>Divon2012</cite>.
+
[[Image:Li-ott-spidergoats-620.jpg|thumb|left|300px| Spider goats, Sugar and Spice, at the Canada Agricultural Museum [http://ca.news.yahoo.com/photos/two-female-spider-goats-not-reproducing-ability-museum-photo-163958841.html]]]
-
=Future directions=
+
One particularly interesting approach to spider silk protein production was through transgenic goats. In the early 2000s, Jeffrey Turner and Paul Ballard, founders of Nexia Biotechnologies, were looking for a new product.  Randolph Lewis of the University of Wyoming had developed a method for introducing a gene of choice into a goat mammary tissue. Lewis licensed the technology to Nexia and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BioSteel BioSteel] was born. Nexia went public in the year 2000 to the largest Canadian IPO in history (at the time) at $42.4 million <cite>McGillOTT2002</cite>. Nexia ultimately never developed a commercially viable BioSteel product and the company went bankrupt in 2009. However, the resulting transgenic "spider goats" still remain. Two goats, Sugar and Spice, were sold to the Canada Agricultural Museum <cite>Divon2012</cite>.
 +
 
 +
In addition to producing spider silk proteins, industrial scale production of spider silk is only achievable with optimized spinning techniques.  This is a crucial component to viable silk synthesis as the microstructure of silk fibers determines the mechanical properties of the silk fibers.  Naturally, spiders attach their dragline to an object and then move away or use their weight to draw the silk.  If forcibly drawn, spider silk loses many of its beneficial material properties. If artificially spun, spider silk typically falls short of the mechanical properties of natural spider silk. For example, artificially spun fibers reached a minimal diameter of 40 &mu;m; whereas, natural fibers can obtain diameters of 2.5 to 4.0 &mu;m. Different draw ratio, speeds, and solvent usage all effect the material properties of the resulting silk fibers.  The conditions needed to achieve the same performance in synthetic fibers as in natural silk fibers have yet to be determined <cite>Scheibel2004</cite>.
 +
 
 +
=Beyond Spider Silk=
The interest in biological materials goes beyond just spider silk.   
The interest in biological materials goes beyond just spider silk.   
-
Mussel glue is a tyrosine-hydroxylated (dopa) protein that if produced reliably and in bulk quantity, would be useful for its underwater adhesive property.  It could be used to attached sensors under the water or repair “wet” living tissue (Stewart, 2011).
+
Mussel glue is a tyrosine-hydroxylated (dopa) protein that if produced reliably and in bulk quantity, would be useful for its underwater adhesive property.  It could be used to attached sensors under the water or repair “wet” living tissue <cite>Stewart2011</cite>. Choi, <i>et al.</i> showed that mussel adhesive protein can be expressed and modified <i>in vivo</i> in <i>Escherichia coli</i> <cite>Choi2012</cite>.
   
   
-
The spicules of sponges are composed mainly of silicatein-alpha.  Recently, Natalio, et al showed that recombinant expression of silicatein-alpha proteins in the presence of CaCl2 and CO2 will self-assemble into synthetic spicules that show strong bending strength ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young's_modulus Young’s modulus] of 14 GPa, which is similar to human bone) <cite>Natalio2013</cite>.
+
The spicules of sponges are composed mainly of silicatein-alpha.  Recently, Natalio, <i>et al.</i> showed that recombinant expression of silicatein-alpha proteins in the presence of CaCl<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> will self-assemble into synthetic spicules that show strong bending strength ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young's_modulus Young’s modulus] of 14 GPa, which is similar to human bone) <cite>Natalio2013</cite>.
-
In another example of bio-inspired materials, researchers at the Wyss Institute for biologically inspired engineering observed that the carnivorous Nepenthes pitcher plant has an extremely slick surface that causes prey to fall into the bottom of the plant where there are digestive juices.  The SLIPS (Slippery Liquid-Infused Porous Surfaces) technology uses a microporous structure to trap a lubricating liquid that repels a wide variety of substances from water to hydrocarbons to crude oil <cite>Wong2011</cite>.   
+
In another example of bio-inspired materials, researchers at the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering observed that the carnivorous <i>Nepenthes</i> pitcher plant has an extremely slick surface that causes prey to fall into the bottom of the plant where there are digestive juices.  The [http://wyss.harvard.edu/staticfiles/ourwork/translation/WyssSLIPS.pdf SLIPS (Slippery Liquid-Infused Porous Surfaces)] technology uses a microporous structure to trap a lubricating liquid that repels a wide variety of substances from water to hydrocarbons to crude oil <cite>Wong2011</cite>.   
These biologically-inspired materials will become accessible to synthetic biology as more is learned about the genetic components of these biological materials and as synthetic biologists understand more about how to engineer and control these components.
These biologically-inspired materials will become accessible to synthetic biology as more is learned about the genetic components of these biological materials and as synthetic biologists understand more about how to engineer and control these components.
Line 69: Line 83:
==2008 Imperial College==
==2008 Imperial College==
-
The [http://2008.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College 2008 Imperial College iGEM team] attempted to make a B. Subtilis platform for inducing production of biomaterials.  Their target proteins appeared to be [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K143035 human elastin] or [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K143038 EAK16-II], a  beta-sheet self-assembling  peptide.
+
The [http://2008.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College 2008 Imperial College iGEM team] attempted to make a <i>B. subtilis</i> platform for inducing production of biomaterials.  Their target proteins appeared to be [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K143035 human elastin] or [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K143038 EAK16-II], a  beta-sheet self-assembling  peptide.
==2010 Newcastle==
==2010 Newcastle==
-
The [http://2010.igem.org/Team:Newcastle 2010 Newcastle iGEM team] designed a system that used Bacilus subtilis to repair cracks in concrete. Their design involved CaCO3 precipitation, filamentous cells, and levan glue excretion to create a filling material.
+
The [http://2010.igem.org/Team:Newcastle 2010 Newcastle iGEM team] designed a system that used <i>Bacilus subtilis</i> to repair cracks in concrete. Their design involved CaCO<sub>3</sub> precipitation, filamentous cells, and levan glue excretion to create a filling material.
==2012 Utah State==
==2012 Utah State==
The [http://2012.igem.org/Team:Utah_State 2012 Utah State iGEM team] engineered the MaSp2 silk gene from  
The [http://2012.igem.org/Team:Utah_State 2012 Utah State iGEM team] engineered the MaSp2 silk gene from  
-
Argiope aurantia.  In addition to biobricking and codon optimizing this gene to minimize GC content, this iGEM team also designed new promoters, terminators, and genes for tRNA overexpression. They also planned on overexpressing serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT) to increase glycine availability to the E. coli expression host.
+
<i>Argiope aurantia</i>.  In addition to biobricking and codon optimizing this gene to minimize GC content, this iGEM team also designed new promoters, terminators, and genes for tRNA overexpression. They also planned on overexpressing serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT) to increase glycine availability to the <i>E. coli</i> expression host.
==2012 UC Chile==
==2012 UC Chile==
Line 93: Line 107:
#Wong2011 pmid=21938066
#Wong2011 pmid=21938066
#Divon2012 [http://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/dailybrew/museum-spider-goats-genetically-engineered-montreal-shock-professor-230216359.html Yahoo News]
#Divon2012 [http://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/dailybrew/museum-spider-goats-genetically-engineered-montreal-shock-professor-230216359.html Yahoo News]
-
 
+
#McGillOTT2002 [http://www.mcgill.ca/files/ott/nexia.pdf Mcgill Office of Technology Transfer]
-
#nameYEAR pmid=
+
#Stewart2011 pmid=21643511
 +
#Choi2012 pmid=23095646
 +
#Widmaier2009 pmid=19756048
 +
#Fu2012 [http://qb3.org/blog/2012/01/enabling-awesome-refactored-materials qb3 news]
 +
#Scheibel2004 pmid=15546497
//
//
-
 
</biblio>
</biblio>

Current revision

Biology is a rich source of inspiration for engineers. Here a basilisk lizard runs on water. [1]
Biology is a rich source of inspiration for engineers. Here a basilisk lizard runs on water. [1]

Biologically-inspired materials, not to be confused with the related field of biomaterials, are any materials which have been engineered with lessons learned from nature. They do not necessarily interact with biological systems in their ultimate application. Rather, biologically-inspired materials use biological materials as models and engineers learn to construct complex composite materials to emulate the desired properties of a biological material.

Contents

Background

Biologically-inspired materials combine material science and biological structure. Materials science involves the study of atomic structure and the interaction of elemental units to form composite substances with complex properties and high performance for many different technological applications. Biological structures are naturally evolved materials that have been refined to serve specific functions in environmental niches. Often times, the properties that make biological structures useful in their natural habitat also make these structures useful for human use. For example, silk is impressively strong and tough, but extremely thin. This has made silk a valuable tool as a medical suture.

Biological structure can often be distinguished from traditional synthetic materials in that it usually displays the following characteristics[1]:

  1. Self-Assembly
  2. Multi-functionality
  3. Hierarchy
  4. Hydration
  5. Mild synthesis conditions
  6. Evolution and environmental constraints
  7. Self-healing capability

Biological structures, like silk, achieve their material properties by controlling their molecular structure and composition. This can result in materials with

  • High tensile strength
  • High toughness
  • High bending resistance

Often times, these materials are lightweight as well [1].

Applications

The repurposing of refined biological structures has led to many useful products:

Burdock seed burrs inspired the invention of Velcro. [2]
Burdock seed burrs inspired the invention of Velcro. [2]

Velcro was inspired by plant burrs, self-cleaning surfaces [2] were inspired by lotus leafs, and shark skin has inspired technology that reduces drag in pipelines, and Sharklet, which prevents bacterial colonization on medical devices in hospitals.

Synthetic Biology and Bio-Inspired Materials

While material scientists learn from nature and emulate biological structure using physics, chemistry, and nanotechnology, synthetic biologists have tried to re-purpose the genetic material of biological structures to recreate the component parts and molecular machinery necessary to scale up production of biological materials to industrial levels.

Examples include spider silk, mussel adhesion protein, and barnacle cement. Here, a small number of gene products are responsible for a useful biological material; however, the amount of total product produced by an individual organism is small. The difficulty of harvesting or maintaining large numbers of these organisms makes it costly for use of the material commercially. The small number of gene products does lead, however, to potentially producing these materials in non-native hosts.

Spider Silk

Spider silk is 4 microns thick. Fifteen times less than a human hair. [3]
Spider silk is 4 microns thick. Fifteen times less than a human hair. [3]

One prime example of the effort to produce a valuable biological material at industrial scale is spider silk.

Spider silk possesses impressive material properties. It has a strength-to-weight ratio close to high-tensile engineering steel (1.1 GPa for silk vs 1.3 GPa for steel). It has an extensibility (“stretchiness”) value more similar to nylon (0.27 for silk vs 0.18 for nylon). And it has a toughness (allowed deformation before failure or fracture) factor greater than rubber (160 for silk vs 100 for rubber) [3]. This unique combination of properties makes spider silk a material of particular industrial interest.

Spider silk has been proposed to be useful for surgical sutures, body armor, and artificial tendons and ligaments among other things.

Spiders are typically capable of producing different kinds of silk with different material properties for different biological functions. Some spiders are capable of making seven different types of silk. Spider silk ranges from sticky, stretchy capture spiral silk to strong, tough major-ampullate (dragline) silk. Dragline silk is a typical target for industrial purposes.

The European garden spider (Araneus diadematus) and the golden orb-web spider, Nephila clavipes, are two spiders whose silk genes have been studied extensively. The major silk genes in A. diadematus are ADF-3 and ADF-4, while in N. clavipes, they are MaSpI and MaSpII.

Industrial scale production of spider silk has been a longtime goal in the field. Unlike silk worms (Bombyx mori), spiders are aggressive and territorial, which makes them difficult to domesticate and farm. This has led to the pursuit of recombinant strategies. High production of recombinant spider silk proteins, however, has also been a challenge. Spider silk proteins are large (up to 15 Mbp) and highly repetitive at the sequence level. Bacterial expression hosts have different codon uses and natural machinery that promotes recombination of repetitive sequences. This has limited the production yields of natural spider silk in bacterial hosts [4]. Multiple other hosts have been used including yeasts, plants, mammalian cells, insect cells, and transgenic animals [5]. Widmaier, et al. engineered a type III secretion system to export silk monomers designed for enhance stability and codon usage [6]. (Widmaier has a startup company called Refactored Materials trying to commercialize synthetic spider silk [7].) No system has proven ideal yet and each requires tradeoffs including cost, yield, and convenience. [8]

Spider goats, Sugar and Spice, at the Canada Agricultural Museum [4]
Spider goats, Sugar and Spice, at the Canada Agricultural Museum [4]

One particularly interesting approach to spider silk protein production was through transgenic goats. In the early 2000s, Jeffrey Turner and Paul Ballard, founders of Nexia Biotechnologies, were looking for a new product. Randolph Lewis of the University of Wyoming had developed a method for introducing a gene of choice into a goat mammary tissue. Lewis licensed the technology to Nexia and BioSteel was born. Nexia went public in the year 2000 to the largest Canadian IPO in history (at the time) at $42.4 million [9]. Nexia ultimately never developed a commercially viable BioSteel product and the company went bankrupt in 2009. However, the resulting transgenic "spider goats" still remain. Two goats, Sugar and Spice, were sold to the Canada Agricultural Museum [10].

In addition to producing spider silk proteins, industrial scale production of spider silk is only achievable with optimized spinning techniques. This is a crucial component to viable silk synthesis as the microstructure of silk fibers determines the mechanical properties of the silk fibers. Naturally, spiders attach their dragline to an object and then move away or use their weight to draw the silk. If forcibly drawn, spider silk loses many of its beneficial material properties. If artificially spun, spider silk typically falls short of the mechanical properties of natural spider silk. For example, artificially spun fibers reached a minimal diameter of 40 μm; whereas, natural fibers can obtain diameters of 2.5 to 4.0 μm. Different draw ratio, speeds, and solvent usage all effect the material properties of the resulting silk fibers. The conditions needed to achieve the same performance in synthetic fibers as in natural silk fibers have yet to be determined [11].

Beyond Spider Silk

The interest in biological materials goes beyond just spider silk.

Mussel glue is a tyrosine-hydroxylated (dopa) protein that if produced reliably and in bulk quantity, would be useful for its underwater adhesive property. It could be used to attached sensors under the water or repair “wet” living tissue [12]. Choi, et al. showed that mussel adhesive protein can be expressed and modified in vivo in Escherichia coli [13].

The spicules of sponges are composed mainly of silicatein-alpha. Recently, Natalio, et al. showed that recombinant expression of silicatein-alpha proteins in the presence of CaCl2 and CO2 will self-assemble into synthetic spicules that show strong bending strength (Young’s modulus of 14 GPa, which is similar to human bone) [14].

In another example of bio-inspired materials, researchers at the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering observed that the carnivorous Nepenthes pitcher plant has an extremely slick surface that causes prey to fall into the bottom of the plant where there are digestive juices. The SLIPS (Slippery Liquid-Infused Porous Surfaces) technology uses a microporous structure to trap a lubricating liquid that repels a wide variety of substances from water to hydrocarbons to crude oil [15].

These biologically-inspired materials will become accessible to synthetic biology as more is learned about the genetic components of these biological materials and as synthetic biologists understand more about how to engineer and control these components.

iGEM Connections

2008 Imperial College

The 2008 Imperial College iGEM team attempted to make a B. subtilis platform for inducing production of biomaterials. Their target proteins appeared to be human elastin or EAK16-II, a beta-sheet self-assembling peptide.

2010 Newcastle

The 2010 Newcastle iGEM team designed a system that used Bacilus subtilis to repair cracks in concrete. Their design involved CaCO3 precipitation, filamentous cells, and levan glue excretion to create a filling material.

2012 Utah State

The 2012 Utah State iGEM team engineered the MaSp2 silk gene from Argiope aurantia. In addition to biobricking and codon optimizing this gene to minimize GC content, this iGEM team also designed new promoters, terminators, and genes for tRNA overexpression. They also planned on overexpressing serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT) to increase glycine availability to the E. coli expression host.

2012 UC Chile

The 2012 UC Chile iGEM team proposed a spider silk secretion system using an OmpA-ADF-3 fusion protein with a HIV protease cleavage site to release the ADF-3 protein into the extracellular medium.

References

  1. Meyers MA, McKittrick J, and Chen PY. . pmid:23413348. PubMed HubMed [Meyers2013]
  2. Blossey R. . pmid:12728235. PubMed HubMed [Blossey2003]
  3. Omenetto FG and Kaplan DL. . pmid:20671180. PubMed HubMed [Omenetto2010]
  4. Vendrely C and Scheibel T. . pmid:17429812. PubMed HubMed [Vendrely2007]
  5. Rising A, Widhe M, Johansson J, and Hedhammar M. . pmid:20668909. PubMed HubMed [Rising2011]
  6. Widmaier DM, Tullman-Ercek D, Mirsky EA, Hill R, Govindarajan S, Minshull J, and Voigt CA. . pmid:19756048. PubMed HubMed [Widmaier2009]
  7. qb3 news [Fu2012]
  8. Widhe M, Johansson J, Hedhammar M, and Rising A. . pmid:21898363. PubMed HubMed [Widhe2012]
  9. Mcgill Office of Technology Transfer [McGillOTT2002]
  10. Yahoo News [Divon2012]
  11. Scheibel T. . pmid:15546497. PubMed HubMed [Scheibel2004]
  12. Stewart RJ, Ransom TC, and Hlady V. . pmid:21643511. PubMed HubMed [Stewart2011]
  13. Choi YS, Yang YJ, Yang B, and Cha HJ. . pmid:23095646. PubMed HubMed [Choi2012]
  14. Natalio F, Corrales TP, Panthöfer M, Schollmeyer D, Lieberwirth I, Müller WE, Kappl M, Butt HJ, and Tremel W. . pmid:23493708. PubMed HubMed [Natalio2013]
  15. Wong TS, Kang SH, Tang SK, Smythe EJ, Hatton BD, Grinthal A, and Aizenberg J. . pmid:21938066. PubMed HubMed [Wong2011]
All Medline abstracts: PubMed HubMed
Personal tools