CH391L/S12/ToxinAntitoxins: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 45: Line 45:
#Melderen2002 pmid=11890555
#Melderen2002 pmid=11890555
//Molecular interactions of the CcdB poison with its bacterial target, the DNA gyrase.
//Molecular interactions of the CcdB poison with its bacterial target, the DNA gyrase.
#Hayes2011 pmid= 21819231
#Hayes2011 pmid=21819231
//Toxins-antitoxins: diversity, evolution and function.
//Toxins-antitoxins: diversity, evolution and function.
</biblio>
</biblio>

Revision as of 19:47, 19 February 2012


Toxin-Antitoxins

Basics of Toxin-Antitoxin (TA) Systems

TA systems are gene addiction constructs that occur naturally in prokaryotes, eukaryotes, and archaea. They consist of two coexpressed proteins: a stable toxin and a labile antitoxin that inhibits the detrimental effects of the toxin on the cell. If expression of the TA gene cassette is inhibited or the genes are purged from cell (from losing a plasmid carrying the TA genes, for example), the labile antitoxin in the cell degrades faster than the stable toxin. The newly uninhibited toxin then exerts its affect on the cell, resulting in growth inhibition or cell death. TA systems work by a wide variety of mechanisms, delineated into three major classes based on the interaction of toxin and antitoxin. TA systems can be located in selfish plasmids or chromosomally; TA systems in plasmids tend to result in cell death whereas chromosomally located TAs tend to be bacteriostatic. The exact mechanisms of action vary greatly between TA systems and a number of reviews have attempted to address most of their variation [1]

Type I Systems

In Type I systems, regulation of the toxin occurs on the RNA level. Antitoxins in this class are antisense RNA that repress the translation of the toxin by binding to its mRNA transcript.

The canonical example of a Type I TA system is the hok-sok system, originally identified in the E. coli plasmid R1 in 1986 [2]. In this system, both the toxin (hok) and antitoxin (sok) are expressed on the plasmid. Left by itself, hok protein results in membrane depolarization, the cessation of respiration, and cell death in most gram-negative bacteria. After transcription, hok mRNA is functionally inactive due to extensive secondary structure. Upon processing of the 3' end of hok transcript, two alternative pathways exist. Sok RNA is complementary to a large portion of the hok transcript. If sok transcripts, it will bind to the hok transcript and the pair will be degraded in an RNase III dependent manner. If sok transcripts are unavailable, hok transcripts will be accessible to translation machinery and result in the production of the toxic hok protein [3].

Type II Systems

In Type II Systems, antitoxin proteins bind to and inhibit toxin proteins.

The canonical example of a Type II TA system is the ccd system isolated from the F plasmid. The toxin in the ccd system, ccdB, causes cell death by acting as a gyrase poison. The ccdB protein binds to and stabilizes the DNA-gyrase complex and a cleavage intermediate and causes double stranded breaks in a replicating genome [4]. The coexpressed ccdA antitoxin protein binds to the ccdB protein and inhibits its toxic mechanism. ccdA, however, is constantly being degraded by ATP-dependant Lon protease. If expression of the ccd operon stops, the ccdA population in a cell will rapidly degrade and free the stable ccdB protein to exert its toxic affects.

Type III Systems

With only one example recently characterized, type III systems work by a small RNA antitoxin directly binding to and inhibiting the protein toxin.


Examples of and uses for TA Systems

ccd in Gateway Cloning

Metabolism Based Plasmid Addiction

Operator Repressor Titration Systems

References

  1. Hayes F and Van Melderen L. Toxins-antitoxins: diversity, evolution and function. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2011 Oct;46(5):386-408. DOI:10.3109/10409238.2011.600437 | PubMed ID:21819231 | HubMed [Hayes2011]

    Toxins-antitoxins: diversity, evolution and function.

  2. Gerdes K, Rasmussen PB, Molin S. (1986) Unique type of plasmid maintenance function: Postsegregational killing of plasmid-free cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:3116-3120

    [Gerdes1986]

    Unique type of plasmid maintenance function: Postsegregational killing of plasmid-free cells.

  3. Gerdes K, Gultyaev AP, Franch T, Pedersen K, and Mikkelsen ND. Antisense RNA-regulated programmed cell death. Annu Rev Genet. 1997;31:1-31. DOI:10.1146/annurev.genet.31.1.1 | PubMed ID:9442888 | HubMed [Gerdes1997]

    Antisense RNA-regulated programmed cell death

  4. Van Melderen L. Molecular interactions of the CcdB poison with its bacterial target, the DNA gyrase. Int J Med Microbiol. 2002 Feb;291(6-7):537-44. DOI:10.1078/1438-4221-00164 | PubMed ID:11890555 | HubMed [Melderen2002]

    Molecular interactions of the CcdB poison with its bacterial target, the DNA gyrase.

All Medline abstracts: PubMed | HubMed