Biomod/2013/NanoUANL/Reactor: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
=== Introduction ===
=== Introduction ===


The CCMV capsid was considered as a continuous stirred-tank reactor with accumulation of the product.  
The CCMV capsid was considered as a continuous stirred-tank reactor with accumulation of the product. This is a common ideal reactor type in chemical engineering. This is an open system that operates on a steady-state assumption, where the conditions of the reactor do not change with time. It is a complete opposite of tubular plug-flow and stirred batch reactors, and can be very useful when studying the behavior of a gas, liquid or solid.  


For an enzymatic reaction of the type:
The reactor is modelled by that of a Continuous Ideally Stirre-Tank Reactor (CISTR), assuming perfect mixing in the container.
 
====Enzymatic Reaction====
 
The general reaction scheme is as follows:


<math>E + S \leftrightarrow ES \rightarrow E^0 + P</math>
<math>E + S \leftrightarrow ES \rightarrow E^0 + P</math>


with a reaction rate of:
With a reaction rate of:


<math>\frac{d[ES]}{dt}=k_1[E][S]-k_{-1}[ES]-k_2[ES]</math>
<math>\frac{d[ES]}{dt}=k_1[E][S]-k_{-1}[ES]-k_2[ES]</math>


We established the following in our system:
This equation is affected by the constants k<sub>1</sub> , k<sub>-1</sub> and k<sub>2</sub>.
 
====Considerations====
 
We established the following considerations in our system:


*Uniform distribution throughout the reactor
*Uniform distribution throughout the reactor
Line 20: Line 28:
*Tortuosity approaches zero during diffusion
*Tortuosity approaches zero during diffusion


====Mass balance====
Mass balance was presented as such:
Mass balance was presented as such:


Line 39: Line 49:
The intake and outflow flux were determined by diffusion , considering a spherical container.  
The intake and outflow flux were determined by diffusion , considering a spherical container.  


[[Image:CCMV2.jpg]]
[[Image:CCMV2.jpg]thumb|right|Diagram of the container]]


For the simplification of the diffusion phenomenon we considered:
For the simplification of the diffusion phenomenon we considered:

Revision as of 11:56, 12 October 2013

What is a reactor?

Introduction

The CCMV capsid was considered as a continuous stirred-tank reactor with accumulation of the product. This is a common ideal reactor type in chemical engineering. This is an open system that operates on a steady-state assumption, where the conditions of the reactor do not change with time. It is a complete opposite of tubular plug-flow and stirred batch reactors, and can be very useful when studying the behavior of a gas, liquid or solid.

The reactor is modelled by that of a Continuous Ideally Stirre-Tank Reactor (CISTR), assuming perfect mixing in the container.

Enzymatic Reaction

The general reaction scheme is as follows:

[math]\displaystyle{ E + S \leftrightarrow ES \rightarrow E^0 + P }[/math]

With a reaction rate of:

[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{d[ES]}{dt}=k_1[E][S]-k_{-1}[ES]-k_2[ES] }[/math]

This equation is affected by the constants k1 , k-1 and k2.

Considerations

We established the following considerations in our system:

  • Uniform distribution throughout the reactor
  • K-1 >> K1 and K2
  • One enzyme per reactor/VLP
  • Tortuosity approaches zero during diffusion


Mass balance

Mass balance was presented as such:

INFLOW= OUTFLOW- DISAPPEARANCE BY REACTION + ACCUMULATION

where

Inflow= F0

Outflow= F0(1-XS)

Disappearance = V(-rS

Accumulation = [math]\displaystyle{ \tfrac{d[P]}{dt} }[/math]

F0 = F0(1-XS) - V(-rS) + [math]\displaystyle{ \tfrac{d[P]}{dt} }[/math]

The intake and outflow flux were determined by diffusion , considering a spherical container.

[[Image:CCMV2.jpg]thumb|right|Diagram of the container]]

For the simplification of the diffusion phenomenon we considered:

  • Constant temperature
  • Constant pressure
  • Species B stays in a stationary state (it does not diffuse in A)
  • The container (VLP) has a spherical shape

A mass balance, taking into account a spherical envelope leads to:

[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{d}{dr}(r^2N_{Ar})=0 }[/math]

where NAr represents molar flux. For NBr we obtain:

[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{d}{dr}(r^2\frac{cD_{AB}}{1-x_A}\frac{dx_A}{dr})=0 }[/math]

At a constant temperature the product (cDAB) is equally constant and xA=1-xB, the equation can be integrated into the following expression:

[math]\displaystyle{ F_A=4\pi r_1^2N_{Ar}|_{r=r1}= \frac{4\pi cD_{AB}}{1/r_1=1/r_2} \ln\frac{x_{B2}}{x_{B1}} }[/math]

where x are the fractions, c is the concentration and r are the respective radii.

This equation defines the nanoreactor inflow; a similar analysis yields the reactor outflow.


The ionic silver diffusion coefficient in function to the solution is described by Nerst's equation (1888)1:

[math]\displaystyle{ D_{AB}°= \frac{RT}{F^2} \frac{\lambda^o_+\lambda^o_-}{\lambda^o_++\lambda^o_-} \frac{|Z_-|+|Z_+|}{|Z_+Z_-|} }[/math]

where

  • F = Faraday's constant
  • DAB°=Diffusion coefficient at infinite dilution
  • λ+°=Cationic conductivity at infinite dilution
  • λ-°=Anionic conductivity at infinite dilution
  • Z+=Cation valence
  • Z-=Anionic valence
  • T=Absolute temperature

Via Joback's method, we obtain the normal boiling temperature:

[math]\displaystyle{ T_b=\mathbf{198} + \sum_{k} N_k(tbk) }[/math]

in which Nk is the number of times that the contribution occurs in the compound.


Using a similar approach, also by Joback, we estimated the critical temperature:

[math]\displaystyle{ T_c=T_b\Bigg[ \mathbf{0.584}+\mathbf{0.965} \bigg\{\sum_{k} N_k(tck) \bigg\} - \bigg\{\sum_{k} N_k(tck) \bigg\}^2 \Bigg]^{-1} }[/math]

Joback Method Contributions (C1 Prausnitz)

[TABLA]


Conductivity was determined by the Sastri method:

[math]\displaystyle{ \lambda_L=\lambda_ba^m }[/math]

where λL = thermic conductivity of the liquid [ W/(m·K)] λb = thermic conductivity at normal boiling point Tbr= T/Tc = reduced temperature Tc = critical temperature, K


[math]\displaystyle{ m=1-\bigg(\frac{1-T_r}{1-T_{br}}\bigg)^n }[/math]

a=0.16 n=0.2

Contribución de Sastri (Tabla 10.5. Prausnitz 5a)

[TABLA]




Silver density

{pendiente}