Biomod/2012/TeamSendai/Experiment

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 21: Line 21:
<h3>DNA sequences</h3>
<h3>DNA sequences</h3>
配列を探して
配列を探して
 +
 +
{|border=1
 +
|+
 +
!Name!!Sequence (5' to 3')!!Tm (°C)
 +
|-
 +
!Target
 +
| align="center"|ACTAGTGAGTGCAGCAGTCGTACCA||---
 +
|-
 +
!Porter 1
 +
| align="center"|TGGTACGACAAAAAAAATGCTGCACAAAAAAAATCACTAGTAAAAAAAAAA||54.8
 +
|-
 +
!Porter 2
 +
| align="center"|TGGTACGACAAAAAAAAGCACTCACTAGTAAAAAAAAAA||63.9
 +
|}
 +
<h3>Transportation of Target by Porter</h3>
<h3>Transportation of Target by Porter</h3>
<h3>Protchol</h3>
<h3>Protchol</h3>

Revision as of 08:44, 27 October 2012

Team Sendai Top


Contents

Gate formation

筒作るためにステイプルをM13と混ぜて、アニーリングした。筒ができているか調べるために電気泳動とAFMで観察した。詳しいアニーリング法?

Electrophoresis

何がどのバンドであるかの説明

AFM image

スケールバーの表示。これが筒であるという根拠。

Porter functionality

We carried out electrophoresis to see if the target moved and hybridized to Porter of higher bonding energy and if the target was successfully transported through the three Porters.

Electrophoresis

DNA sequences

配列を探して

NameSequence (5' to 3')Tm (°C)
Target ACTAGTGAGTGCAGCAGTCGTACCA---
Porter 1 TGGTACGACAAAAAAAATGCTGCACAAAAAAAATCACTAGTAAAAAAAAAA54.8
Porter 2 TGGTACGACAAAAAAAAGCACTCACTAGTAAAAAAAAAA63.9

Transportation of Target by Porter

Protchol

First, we mixed Porter1 and the target for reaction. Second, we added Porter2, expecting that the target would be passed from Porter1 to Porter2. Finally, we added Porter3, expecting that the target would be passed from Porter2 to Porter3.We waited for 15 minutes at each step, letting the target attach to a Porter of higher bonding energy.

The final concentration of samples were follows.
The target DNA: 0.5 μM
Porter 1,2,3: 1.0 μM
Dilution was performed with 1 x TAE Mg2+. The total volume was 5 μM.

Electrophoresis were performed with:
20% acrylamide gel
1×TAE as running buffers
Constant volt 100 V, 3h

Results

If the target has passed well through Porters, bands of the target hybridizing with Porter1, 2, and 3 should appear from the left side.In the gel, bands are above each Porter.The result shows that target hybridized with available Porter during the 15 minutes, and then it moved to the Porter that has higher bonding energy during another 15 minutes. Therefore, this indicates that Porter (1, 2, and 3) successfully work as “porter” of the target.

Comparison of Porter and Toehold

We saw that Porter catches the target more effectively than the toehold structure by our simulations. In addition, we actually confirmed this idea through experiments.

Protchol

We compared the carrier set of the target as below.

1. Porter1 and Porter2
2. Toehold A and toehold B

First, we mixed the target and Porter1. At the same time, we also mixed the target and toehold A.Second, we added Porter2 to the sample of Porter1 and the target. At the same time, we added toehold B to the sample of toehold B and the target. We waited for 15 minutes at each step, for the sample to react.
The final concentration of samples were follows.
The target DNA: 0.5 μM
Porter 1,2,3: 1.0 μM
Toehold A,B: 1.0 μM
Dilution was performed with 1 x TAE Mg2+. The total volume was 5 μM.

Electrophoresis were performed with:
20% acrylamide gel
1×TAE as running buffers
Constant volt 100 V, 3h

Results

The Wikipede edits Electrophoresis.
Fig 2. Lanes are (1) porter1, (2) porter2, (3) Target, (4) toehold A, (it is not indicated in the picture) (5) toehold B, (6) target and porter1, (7) target and porter1 and 2, (8) target and porter2, (9) target and toehold A, (10) target and toehold A and toehold B, (11) target and toehold B, (12) 20kb ladder

The target was passed between porters (lane 7). But the target didn’t attach to toehold A (lane 9). So, the target cannot be delivered by the toehold structure (lane 10)
Similar to the interaction of Porters and the target, Porter1 and Porter2 attached to the target respectively (figure2: lane6 and 8). Also, the target was passed between Porters (lane 7).As for the toehold structure, the target hybridized with toehold B. On the other hand, in the lane of the target and toehold A, the band of the target is still strong (lane 9). So, the target didn’t hybridize with toehold A. It follows that toehold A cannot catch the target only in 15 minutes, and that the target cannot be delivered by using toehold structures. Therefore, we concluded that Porter structure, which has some loops, is more effective and efficient than toehold in terms of catching the target.


Cholesterol tag modification

Electrophoresis

Personal tools