From OpenWetWare

< Biomod | 2011 | Slovenia/BioNanoWizards
Revision as of 21:10, 2 November 2011 by Jernej Turnsek (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Vertical stacks

DNA origami rectangles based on a single-stranded M13 DNA have dimensions around 100 nm (Rothemund, 2006). Extension into the third dimension created variable shapes such as different geometrical objects (Shih, 2004) and a box (Andersen, 2009), weaving the compact 3D objects from several connected layers (Douglas, 2009). 3D shells were also produced by bending dsDNA (Han, 2011). Two dimensional tiling by stitching DNA origami rectangles was reported (Endo, 2010). In general 3D DNA origami design has so far relied mostly on shaping a single M13 DNA strand, which restricted to some extent more complex functional applications of bionanomolecular structures.

The main motivation for the idea of creating vertical stacks of DNA origami is the possibility to combine two or more differently-modified DNA origami breadboards, (e.g. metalized or covered with bound conductive carbon nanotubes), which is not possible using single continuous thread. Precise positioning of DNA origami layers could be achieved using tethers connecting two neighboring DNA origami layers.

Vertical stacking of DNA origami layers could be accomplished using either DNA or proteins as tethers. The vertical order of DNA origami layers in the stack could be designed at will using interacting tethers on each face of the DNA origami layers. The common approach of DNA and protein tethers is that they both include replacement of conventional staples with their extended versions, resulting in either single-stranded or double-stranded DNA extensions which point perpendicularly to the plane of DNA origami to directly interact or serve as a protein docking site, respectively.

This type of vertical stacks may lead to nanoscale electronic applications, elaborated in the Discussion. Stacking could additionally be used to create masks for the formation of 3D patterns similar as in photolithography. Vertical stacking can increase the density of integration, which is an approach that is actively pursued in the development of 3D integrated circuits.

DNA tethers

The idea of DNA tethers is to use unique complementary single stranded DNA sequences protruding perpendicularly from the DNA origami. Their positions on the opposing face of the other DNA origami stacking partner are placed at the mirrored positions (Figure 4). Implementation of this idea requires rational selection of complementary staple extensions and some additional modifications (described in Methods) as the tethering segments protrude from different faces of DNA origami rectangles. By introducing such staples so that they project out of the DNA origami perpendicularly in both directions, multiple (in theory infinite) DNA origami stacks could be formed. Precise positioning of two DNA origami layers above each other requires introduction of several tethers and their asymmetric arrangement to prevent formation of staggered overlays.

Figure 4. Vertical DNA origami stacks based on single-stranded DNA tethers. DNA origami planes are modified independently using staple strands with ssDNA extensions protruding perpendicularly into solution.

Protein tethers

DNA tethers have some potential drawbacks, in the first place the lack of rigidity in comparison to globular protein domains. We reasoned that we could use the same idea of ZFP-based DNA origami add-ons also for the creation of vertical stacks.

For this purpose DNA origami is modified at selected sites with the same type of double stranded ZFP binding sites perpendicular to the DNA origami plane as in protein add-ons. We developed two approaches to protein tethers based on twin ZFP binding domains and ZFP-protein heterodimeric tethering domain.

Bifunctional - twin ZFP based approach

Here, the tethering molecule is composed of two distinct ZFPs each recognizing origami attachment site on a different DNA origami layer. This chimeric protein fusion, bridged with a solubility domain (MBP), is prepared in recombinant form in bacteria. Similarly to DNA tethering approach one could in theory expect formation of a long vertical stack by the addition of two different ZFP attachment sites on the opposing faces of DNA origami

Figure 5: Protein-based tethering of DNA origami planes with twin ZFP chimeras. (a) Basic element for such protein mediated tethering comprises a solubility enhancing domain (MBP) flanked by two distinct ZFPs. (b) Numerous recombinantly produced twin ZFP chimeras stabilize DNA origami planes at defined distance locking down the stack.

Introduction of several protein tethers is expected to significantly increase the stability of such stacks due to the cooperative interactions between several neighboring binding sites, therefore even ZFPs with weaker affinities could be used for the stacking purpose. The expected affinity of six neighboring ZFP interactions should exceed the biotin/streptavidin affinity. Formation of stacks requires the precise stoichiometry of each component in the reaction mixture as the excess of ZFP protein tethers could be inhibitory to the interaction, while the lower ratio would result in missing tethers. One solution would be to first functionalize one DNA origami plane with excessive amounts of twin ZFP chimeras, remove the surplus of proteins and then titrate the system with the second DNA origami plane.

Protein heterodimer approach

Tethering two faces of DNA origami could also be achieved by the incorporation of different protein heterodimerization domains. In contrast to twin ZFP protein tethers two different proteins have to be prapared. However the advantage of the heterodimer approach is that interactions between heterodimers could be regulated and derivatization of DNA origami with bound ZFP-interacting domains can be performed separately.

Figure 6: DNA origami tethering based on protein heterodimerization. (a) Schemes depict two elements (recombinant proteins in the form of ZFP-solubility tag-dimerizing domain) necessary for stacking of DNA origami planes. (b) After functionalizing each layer seperately and equimolarly mixing the two, stacks are formed. In case of smaller ligands acting as dimerizing partners, such nanoarchitectures could be disassembled by adding excessive amounts of a free ligand to the sample.

Coiled-coil-dimer based approach

Coiled-coils are naturally occurring protein domains comprising intertwined alpha helices in parallel or antiparallel orientation. The idea here is to genetically fuse each of the two coiled-coil forming segments to one of the two MBP-ZFP chimeras. Coiled-coil interactions therefore mediate stacking of DNA origami layers decorated at the defined positions through the specific ZFP binding domain. Preferably the interactions between coiled-coil partners are antiparallel (McClain, 2001), with coiled-coil segment serving as a rigid rod, separating the two layers.

SH3- SH3 ligand based approach

SH3- SH3 ligand pair forms tight and specific interaction and has been used to assemble protein scaffold in a biosynthetic reaction (Dueber, 2009). We considered this interaction, even though it is in the sub μM range, for the formation of a vertical stack. Addition of a soluble SH3 ligand peptide could be used to regulate the disassembly of the stack. Similarly to the strategy using coiled-coils, two DNA origami planes would need to be separately functionalized with the two chimeras and mixed at equimolar ratios to form a stack.

  • Andersen ES, Dong M, Nielsen MM, Jahn K, Subramani R, Mamdouh W, Golas MM, Sander B, Stark H, Oliveira CL, Pedersen JS, Birkedal V, Besenbacher F, Gothelf KV, Kjems J (2009) Self-assembly of a nanoscale DNA box with a controllable lid. Nature 459: 73-76.
  • Douglas SM, Dietz H, Liedl T, Högberg B, Graf F, Shih WM (2009) Self-assembly of DNA into nanoscale three-dimensional shapes. Nature 459: 414-418.
  • Dueber JE, Wu GC, Malmirchegini GR, Moon TS, Petzold CJ, Ullal AV, Prather KL, Keasling JD (2009) Synthetic protein scaffolds provide modular control over metabolic flux. Nature Biotechnol 28: 753-9.
  • Endo M, Sugita T, Katsuda Y, Hidaka K, Sugiyama H (2010) Programmed-assembly system using DNA jigsaw pieces. Chemistry 18: 5362-5368.
  • Han D, Pal S, Nangreave J, Deng Z, Liu Y, Yan H (2011) DNA origami with complex curvatures in three-dimensional space. Science 332:342-6.
  • McClain DL, Woods HL, Oakley MG (2001) Design and Characterization of a Heterodimeric Coiled Coil that Forms Exclusively with an Antiparallel Relative Helix Orientation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123: 3151-3152.
  • Rothemund PWK (2006) Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature 440: 297-302.
  • Shih WM, Quispe JD, Joyce GF (2004) A 1.7-kilobase single-stranded DNA that folds into a nanoscale octahedron. Nature 427: 618-621.

BioNanoWizards - BioMod 2011 team Slovenia. Design by Free CSS Templates.

Personal tools