BMJ Statistics Notes series: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 16: Line 16:
== ''Statistical Notes''  publications (in chronological order) ==
== ''Statistical Notes''  publications (in chronological order) ==


=== 1994 ===
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/308/6933/896 Correlation, regression, and repeated data] J Martin Bland & Douglas G Altman BMJ 1994;308:896 (2 April)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/308/6933/896 Correlation, regression, and repeated data] J Martin Bland & Douglas G Altman BMJ 1994;308:896 (2 April)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/308/6942/1499  Regression towards the mean] J Martin Bland & Douglas G Altman BMJ 1994;308:1499 (4 June)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/308/6942/1499  Regression towards the mean] J Martin Bland & Douglas G Altman BMJ 1994;308:1499 (4 June)
Line 25: Line 26:
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/309/6960/996  Quartiles, quintiles, centiles, and other quantiles] Douglas G Altman & J Martin Bland BMJ 1994;309:996 (15 October)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/309/6960/996  Quartiles, quintiles, centiles, and other quantiles] Douglas G Altman & J Martin Bland BMJ 1994;309:996 (15 October)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/309/6962/1128  Matching] J Martin Bland & Douglas G Altman BMJ 1994;309:1128 (29 October)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/309/6962/1128  Matching] J Martin Bland & Douglas G Altman BMJ 1994;309:1128 (29 October)
----
 
=== 1995 ===
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/310/6973/170  Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method] J Martin Bland & Douglas G Altman BMJ 1995;310:170 (21 January)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/310/6973/170  Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method] J Martin Bland & Douglas G Altman BMJ 1995;310:170 (21 January)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/310/6975/298 The normal distribution] Douglas G Altman & J Martin Bland BMJ 1995;310:298 (4 February)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/310/6975/298 The normal distribution] Douglas G Altman & J Martin Bland BMJ 1995;310:298 (4 February)
Line 31: Line 33:
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/310/6980/633 Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 2--correlation between subjects] J Martin Bland & Douglas G Altman BMJ 1995;310:633 (11 March)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/310/6980/633 Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 2--correlation between subjects] J Martin Bland & Douglas G Altman BMJ 1995;310:633 (11 March)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/311/7003/485 Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence] Douglas G Altman & J Martin Bland BMJ 1995;311:485 (19 August)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/311/7003/485 Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence] Douglas G Altman & J Martin Bland BMJ 1995;311:485 (19 August)
----
 
=== 1996 ===
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/312/7030/572 Presentation of numerical data] J Martin Bland & Douglas G Altman BMJ 1996;312:572 (2 March)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/312/7030/572 Presentation of numerical data] J Martin Bland & Douglas G Altman BMJ 1996;312:572 (2 March)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/312/7032/700 Logarithms] J Martin Bland & Douglas G Altman BMJ 1996;312:700 (16 March)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/312/7032/700 Logarithms] J Martin Bland & Douglas G Altman BMJ 1996;312:700 (16 March)
Line 45: Line 48:
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/313/7061/862 Interaction 3: How to examine heterogeneity] John NS Matthews & Douglas G Altman BMJ 1996;313:862 (5 October)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/313/7061/862 Interaction 3: How to examine heterogeneity] John NS Matthews & Douglas G Altman BMJ 1996;313:862 (5 October)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/313/7066/1200 Detecting skewness from summary information] Douglas G Altman & J Martin Bland BMJ 1996;313:1200 (9 November)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/313/7066/1200 Detecting skewness from summary information] Douglas G Altman & J Martin Bland BMJ 1996;313:1200 (9 November)
----
 
=== 1997 ===
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/314/7080/572 Cronbach's alpha] J Martin Bland & Douglas G Altman BMJ 1997;314:572 (22 February)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/314/7080/572 Cronbach's alpha] J Martin Bland & Douglas G Altman BMJ 1997;314:572 (22 February)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/314/7098/1874 Units of analysis] Douglas G Altman & J Martin Bland BMJ 1997;314:1874 (28 June)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/314/7098/1874 Units of analysis] Douglas G Altman & J Martin Bland BMJ 1997;314:1874 (28 June)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/315/7108/600 Trials randomised in clusters] J Martin Bland & Sally M Kerry BMJ 1997;315:600 (6 September)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/315/7108/600 Trials randomised in clusters] J Martin Bland & Sally M Kerry BMJ 1997;315:600 (6 September)
----
 
=== 1998 ===
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/316/7124/54 Analysis of a trial randomised in clusters] Sally M Kerry & Martin Bland BMJ 1998;316:54
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/316/7124/54 Analysis of a trial randomised in clusters] Sally M Kerry & Martin Bland BMJ 1998;316:54
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/316/7125/129 Weighted comparison of means] Martin Bland & Sally M Kerry BMJ 1998;316:129 (10 January)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/316/7125/129 Weighted comparison of means] Martin Bland & Sally M Kerry BMJ 1998;316:129 (10 January)
Line 59: Line 64:
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/317/7172/1572 Survival probabilities (the Kaplan-Meier method)] J Martin Bland, & Douglas G Altman BMJ 1998;317:1572-1580 (5 December)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/317/7172/1572 Survival probabilities (the Kaplan-Meier method)] J Martin Bland, & Douglas G Altman BMJ 1998;317:1572-1580 (5 December)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/318/7192/1209 Treatment allocation in controlled trials: why randomise?] Douglas G Altman & J Martin Bland BMJ 1999;318:1209-1209 (1 May)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/318/7192/1209 Treatment allocation in controlled trials: why randomise?] Douglas G Altman & J Martin Bland BMJ 1999;318:1209-1209 (1 May)
----
 
=== 1999 ===
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/318/7199/1667 Variables and parameters] Douglas G Altman & J Martin Bland BMJ 1999;318:1667-1667 (19 June)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/318/7199/1667 Variables and parameters] Douglas G Altman & J Martin Bland BMJ 1999;318:1667-1667 (19 June)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/319/7211/703 How to randomise] Douglas G Altman & J Martin Bland BMJ 1999;319:703-704 (11 September)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/319/7211/703 How to randomise] Douglas G Altman & J Martin Bland BMJ 1999;319:703-704 (11 September)
----
 
=== 2000 ===
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/320/7247/1468 The odds ratio] Douglas G Altman & J Martin Bland BMJ 2000;320:1468 (27 May)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/320/7247/1468 The odds ratio] Douglas G Altman & J Martin Bland BMJ 2000;320:1468 (27 May)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/321/7259/504 Blinding in clinical trials and other studies] Simon J Day & Douglas G Altman BMJ 2000;321:504 (19 August)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/321/7259/504 Blinding in clinical trials and other studies] Simon J Day & Douglas G Altman BMJ 2000;321:504 (19 August)
----
 
=== 2001 ===
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7310/446 Concealing treatment allocation in randomised trials] Douglas G Altman & Kenneth F Schulz BMJ 2001;323:446-447 (25 August)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7310/446 Concealing treatment allocation in randomised trials] Douglas G Altman & Kenneth F Schulz BMJ 2001;323:446-447 (25 August)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7321/1123  Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements] Andrew J Vickers & Douglas G Altman BMJ 2001;323:1123-1124 (10 November)
* [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7321/1123  Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements] Andrew J Vickers & Douglas G Altman BMJ 2001;323:1123-1124 (10 November)
----
 
=== 2002 ===
* [http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7337/606  Validating scales and indexes] J Martin Bland & Douglas G Altman BMJ 2002;324:606-607 (9 March)
* [http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7337/606  Validating scales and indexes] J Martin Bland & Douglas G Altman BMJ 2002;324:606-607 (9 March)
----
 
=== 2003 ===
* [http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/326/7382/219  Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates] Douglas G Altman & J Martin Bland BMJ 2003;326:219 (25 January)
* [http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/326/7382/219  Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates] Douglas G Altman & J Martin Bland BMJ 2003;326:219 (25 January)
----
 
=== 2004 ===
* [http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/328/7447/1073  The logrank test] J Martin Bland & Douglas G Altman BMJ 2004 328(7447):1073 (1 May)
* [http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/328/7447/1073  The logrank test] J Martin Bland & Douglas G Altman BMJ 2004 328(7447):1073 (1 May)
* [http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/329/7458/168  Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios.] JJ Deeks & Douglas G Altman BMJ 2004 329:168-169
* [http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/329/7458/168  Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios.] JJ Deeks & Douglas G Altman BMJ 2004 329:168-169

Revision as of 05:21, 23 April 2007

back to stats portal

The statistical notes series is a great series of short articles on statistics for medical researchers. The text is accessible and useful also for biologists. Have a read! And update the list if you come across a new publication in the series. The publisher, BMJ [1], makes the articles publicly available only after 12 months. That means, links to the most recent papers are for subscribers only.

An opinion on the series

Gerard E. Dallal, author of the excellent "Little Handbook of Statistical Practice" [2], says this about the series:

"Perhaps the finest series of short articles on the use of statistics is the occasional series of Statistics Notes started in 1994 by the British Medical Journal. ...

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence is something every investigator should know, but too few do. Along with Interaction 2: compare effect sizes not P values, these articles describe two of the most common fatal mistakes in manuscripts submitted to research journals. The faulty reasoning leading to these errors is so seductive that papers containing these errors sometimes slip through the reviewing process and misinterpretations of data are published as fact.

Correlation, regression, and repeated data, Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 1--correlation within subjects, and Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 2--correlation between subjects provide an excellent introduction to the subtleties of analyzing repeated measurements on the same subject.

Statistical Notes  publications (in chronological order)

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004