BME100 s2014:W Group1 L6: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 22: Line 22:




''[Instructions: add the name of your team's company and/or product here]''
[[Image:PCRfandom.jpg]]
 


<!-- Note: Delete any image placeholders that you do not need. -->
<!-- Note: Delete any image placeholders that you do not need. -->
Line 33: Line 32:
'''TinkerCAD'''<br>
'''TinkerCAD'''<br>


''[Instructions: A short summary (up to five sentences) of the TinkerCAD tool and how you used it in lab on November 20th]''<br>
Tinkercad is a simple program to allow us to design items in three dimensions. We simply uploaded a preexisting section of the Open PCR using the tools on the left hand tool bar. At that point we uploaded two of the preexisting fan base. Positioning the fans we prepared to group them before adding fan blades to the design.<br>




'''Our Design'''<br>
'''Our Design'''<br>


''[Instructions: Show an image of your TinkerCAD design here]''
[[Image:Fan.png]]
*PCR Fandom design


''[Instructions: A short paragraph describing your design. Why did you choose this design? How is it different from the original OpenPCR design?]''<br>
Our design is simple. To increase the cooling efficiency of the Open PCR we doubled the number of fans to double the cooling potential. Our PCR machine had issues cooling and this design change would negate the flaw we observed. This allows for more rapid cycle completion and efficient usage of time within the system. Less time will be wasted on inefficient cooling allowing more DNA replication.<br>




Line 50: Line 50:


'''Background on the disease-associated mutation'''<br>
'''Background on the disease-associated mutation'''<br>
''[Instructions: Use the answers from questions 3 - 7 to compose, in your own words, a paragraph about rs237025]''


The SNP (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism) variation, rs237025, is found in Homo Sapiens on chromosome 6:149721690. This section of DNA has multiple variations, called polymorphisms.  The genes associated with SNP are SUM04 and TAR2 which linked to Type I and II diabetes.  SUM04 is the Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier 4. Regulation of Nf-Kappa-β-dependent transcription of ILI2B gene control the target proteins sub-cellular localization, stability or activity.  An allele alternative form of a gene that ultimatly determines the phenotype.
The SNP (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism) variation, rs237025, is found in Homo Sapiens on chromosome 6:149721690. This section of DNA has multiple variations, called polymorphisms.  The genes associated with SNP are SUM04 and TAR2 which linked to Type I and II diabetes.  SUM04 is the Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier 4. Regulation of Nf-Kappa-β-dependent transcription of ILI2B gene control the target proteins sub-cellular localization, stability or activity.  An allele alternative form of a gene that ultimatly determines the phenotype.
Line 71: Line 69:


<!-- Note: Be sure to delete the text in brackets: ''[ ]'' -->
<!-- Note: Be sure to delete the text in brackets: ''[ ]'' -->
In our new design we add two fans to increase the rate of cooling of the lead, the older design was slower in decreasing the temperature of the polymerise chain reaction which gave us inaccurate data measurements. The new design provides an accurate real time polymerise chain reaction and that helps in copying one strand of DNA. For example, we could copy the HIV DNA because it has one strand.
In the design we copied the original fan and added two fans. Although it will consume a higher amount of electricity and have a much higher price, you will get more accurate results and less chance of bias. The addition of another fan will make the process of


==Feature 3: Hardware - PCR Machine & Fluorimeter==
==Feature 3: Hardware - PCR Machine & Fluorimeter==
As mentioned before, PCR Fandom, an adaption of Open PCR, has a more accurate temperature control. The main difference in added fan that will facilitate temperature changes to get more accurate results by reaching the desirable temperatures to duplicate DNA. Both fans will be placed on the inside at the same level. PCR Fandom hardware is made of wood, and will also have an additional layer of stainless steel which will make it more resistant and durable.


The PCR machine will come in a separate box. It will come in separate pieces and have instructions with how to assemble the PCR machine.  The fluorimeter comes flat in the same box as the PCR machine. 
The fluorimeter will be incorporated to the system by having a more stable structure. This will be accomplished by having the base of the fluorimeter attached to the box so that we can get more precise pictures without the need to adjust it every time a new sample is placed in the ridge. To increase or decrease the height of the system or to move the cell phone base forward or backward, a mechanism will be implemented.
 
We noticed that the PCR machine had trouble cooling down, and staying at a consistent temperature. To remedy this, a second fan was added to the machine. The inclusion of two fans in the PCR machine makes cooling more efficient and helps to maintain temperature, a vital aspect of PCR.
 
<!-- Note: Be sure to delete the text in brackets: ''[ ]'' -->


==Bonus Opportunity: What Bayesian Stats Imply About The BME100 Diagnostic Approach==
==Bonus Opportunity: What Bayesian Stats Imply About The BME100 Diagnostic Approach==


''[Instructions: This section is OPTIONAL, and will get bonus points if answered thoroughly and correctly. Here is a chance to flex some intellectual muscle. In your own words, discuss what the results for calculations 3 and 4 imply about the reliability of PCR for predicting the disease. Please do NOT type the actual numerical values here. Just refer to them as being "less than one" or "very small." The instructors will ask you to submit your actual calculations via a Blackboard quiz. We are doing so for the sake of academic integrity and to curb any temptation to cheat.]''
In order to check the reliability of PCR, we used Bayesian statistics. This calculations describe the sensitivity of the system regarding the ability to predict the disease and the specificity of the system regarding the ability to predict the disease. For calculation 3, the sensitivity was calculated (the probability that a patient with the disease will get a positive result). The value was less than one in a significant way. This means that the probability for a patient with the disease to get a positive, and hence accurate result, is low. On the other hand, for calculation 4, where the specificity was calculated (the probability of a patient without the disease to have a negative result), the result was almost one. The latter means that the chances to get a negative result when the patient does not have the disease are high.  
 


Since just one calculations seems to have a high probability, it can be concluded that PCR tests are not always accurate. For other calculations the values were bigger than one. This suggests that in order to get more accurate and reliable results we need a greater range of samples to be analyzed. The deficiency in this test might be due to the lack of samples, errors in the experimental design, the misuse of Open PCR, and not having the best work place to take place the experiment. The limitations of our diagnostic test are noticeable, but still can be improved by making use of the material appropriately and having a more significant number of samples.


<!-- Do not edit below this line -->
<!-- Do not edit below this line -->
|}
|}

Revision as of 02:05, 23 April 2014

BME 100 Spring 2014 Home
People
Lab Write-Up 1 | Lab Write-Up 2 | Lab Write-Up 3
Lab Write-Up 4 | Lab Write-Up 5 | Lab Write-Up 6
Course Logistics For Instructors
Photos
Wiki Editing Help


OUR COMPANY

Name: Maria Jose Quezada
Role(s): Protocols
Name: Danielle Eldred
Role(s): Open PCR and Machine Testing
Name: John Tobey
Role(s): Research and Development
Name: David Kish
Role(s): Open PCR and Machine Testing
Name: Khalid Al-Qahtani
Role(s): Research and Development



LAB 6 WRITE-UP

Computer-Aided Design

TinkerCAD

Tinkercad is a simple program to allow us to design items in three dimensions. We simply uploaded a preexisting section of the Open PCR using the tools on the left hand tool bar. At that point we uploaded two of the preexisting fan base. Positioning the fans we prepared to group them before adding fan blades to the design.


Our Design

  • PCR Fandom design

Our design is simple. To increase the cooling efficiency of the Open PCR we doubled the number of fans to double the cooling potential. Our PCR machine had issues cooling and this design change would negate the flaw we observed. This allows for more rapid cycle completion and efficient usage of time within the system. Less time will be wasted on inefficient cooling allowing more DNA replication.



Feature 1: Disease SNP-Specific Primers

Background on the disease-associated mutation

The SNP (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism) variation, rs237025, is found in Homo Sapiens on chromosome 6:149721690. This section of DNA has multiple variations, called polymorphisms. The genes associated with SNP are SUM04 and TAR2 which linked to Type I and II diabetes. SUM04 is the Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier 4. Regulation of Nf-Kappa-β-dependent transcription of ILI2B gene control the target proteins sub-cellular localization, stability or activity. An allele alternative form of a gene that ultimatly determines the phenotype.

Primer design

  • Disease SNP-specific Forward Primer: 5' ATGATGCTTTCGATGTTGTA 3'
  • Reverse Primer: 5' TACTACGAAAGCTACAACAT 3'

When the DNA double helix is separated, the primers will only bind to the specific site on the DNA that contains perfectly complementary nucleotide bases. If the sequences are not exactly complementary, they primer(s) will not bind. This will cause the DNA amplification to fail.



Feature 2: Consumables Kit

The consumables will be in a separate box that has the option to be included with the box containing the entire PCR kit. The consumables box will include all of the materials used in the lab. All of the similar parts will be in separate, sealed & labeled bags. The micropipettor will be in its own, smaller box to avoid breakage.


In our new design we add two fans to increase the rate of cooling of the lead, the older design was slower in decreasing the temperature of the polymerise chain reaction which gave us inaccurate data measurements. The new design provides an accurate real time polymerise chain reaction and that helps in copying one strand of DNA. For example, we could copy the HIV DNA because it has one strand. In the design we copied the original fan and added two fans. Although it will consume a higher amount of electricity and have a much higher price, you will get more accurate results and less chance of bias. The addition of another fan will make the process of

Feature 3: Hardware - PCR Machine & Fluorimeter

As mentioned before, PCR Fandom, an adaption of Open PCR, has a more accurate temperature control. The main difference in added fan that will facilitate temperature changes to get more accurate results by reaching the desirable temperatures to duplicate DNA. Both fans will be placed on the inside at the same level. PCR Fandom hardware is made of wood, and will also have an additional layer of stainless steel which will make it more resistant and durable.

The fluorimeter will be incorporated to the system by having a more stable structure. This will be accomplished by having the base of the fluorimeter attached to the box so that we can get more precise pictures without the need to adjust it every time a new sample is placed in the ridge. To increase or decrease the height of the system or to move the cell phone base forward or backward, a mechanism will be implemented.

Bonus Opportunity: What Bayesian Stats Imply About The BME100 Diagnostic Approach

In order to check the reliability of PCR, we used Bayesian statistics. This calculations describe the sensitivity of the system regarding the ability to predict the disease and the specificity of the system regarding the ability to predict the disease. For calculation 3, the sensitivity was calculated (the probability that a patient with the disease will get a positive result). The value was less than one in a significant way. This means that the probability for a patient with the disease to get a positive, and hence accurate result, is low. On the other hand, for calculation 4, where the specificity was calculated (the probability of a patient without the disease to have a negative result), the result was almost one. The latter means that the chances to get a negative result when the patient does not have the disease are high.

Since just one calculations seems to have a high probability, it can be concluded that PCR tests are not always accurate. For other calculations the values were bigger than one. This suggests that in order to get more accurate and reliable results we need a greater range of samples to be analyzed. The deficiency in this test might be due to the lack of samples, errors in the experimental design, the misuse of Open PCR, and not having the best work place to take place the experiment. The limitations of our diagnostic test are noticeable, but still can be improved by making use of the material appropriately and having a more significant number of samples.