BME100 f2016:Group2 W8AM L3: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 36: Line 36:


[[Image:HeartRate.jpg]]
[[Image:HeartRate.jpg]]
''Note: The "Gold Standard" heart rate was measured with a pulse oximeter.'' <br>


Gold Standard - Average: 96.4974026 <br>
Gold Standard - Average: 96.4974026 <br>
Line 42: Line 44:
Gold Standard - Standard Deviation: 25.99859918 <br>
Gold Standard - Standard Deviation: 25.99859918 <br>
Spree - Standard Deviation: 27.10634861 <br>
Spree - Standard Deviation: 27.10634861 <br>
Pearson's R: 0.730784539 <br>


'''Temperature''' <br>
'''Temperature''' <br>


[[Image:Temperature.jpg]]
[[Image:Temperature.jpg]]
''Note: The "Gold Standard" temperature was measured with an oral thermometer.'' <br>


Gold Standard - Average: 95.48115152 <br>
Gold Standard - Average: 95.48115152 <br>
Line 54: Line 56:
Gold Standard - Standard Deviation: 10.76273631 <br>
Gold Standard - Standard Deviation: 10.76273631 <br>
Spree - Standard Deviation: 12.81217932 <br>
Spree - Standard Deviation: 12.81217932 <br>
Pearson's R: 0.797813158 <br>


<br>
<br>
Line 64: Line 64:


P-Value (Paired): 0.298225789 <br>
P-Value (Paired): 0.298225789 <br>
Pearson's R: 0.730784539 <br>
[[Image:HeartRateScatterPlot.jpg]]


'''Temperature''' <br>
'''Temperature''' <br>


P-Value (Paired): 9.25843E-05 <br>
P-Value (Paired): 9.25843E-05 <br>
Pearson's R: 0.797813158 <br>
[[Image:TemperatureScatterPlot.jpg]]


<br>
<br>
Line 73: Line 79:
==Design Flaws and Recommendations==
==Design Flaws and Recommendations==


Based on the experimental results, it is determined that the Spree Band tracker is not effective for the intended purposes. The temperature and the heart rate were recorded from the headband, while at the same time they were recorded by the "gold standards": a thermometer as well as a pulse oximeter. After the results were recorded from all the devices and the Spree Bands were compared to the measurements taken from the gold standard devices, it was the decided that the Spree Band was not effective in the measurements, the device is flawed and provided inaccurate measurements, and is altogether unappealing to consumers.
When comparing the pulse ox heart rate measurements to those of the Spree Band, it is important to look at Pearson's R value. In this care, it is 0.730784539, meaning that there is a weak, positive correlation between the two devices. When comparing the P-Value (Paired) from the T-Test, 0.298225789, it is seen that it is greater than 0.05. This means that there is a significant difference between the measurements. <br>


When comparing the oral thermometer temperature measurements to those of the Spree Band, it is important to look at Pearson's R value. In this case, it is 0.797813158, meaning that there is a weak, positive correlation between the two devices. When comparing the P-Value (Paired) from the T-Test, 9.25843E-05 , it is seen that it is very close to zero. <br>


<br><br>
Based on the experimental results, it is determined that the Spree Band tracker is not effective for the intended purposes. The temperature and the heart rate were recorded from both the Spree (headband) and the Gold Standard Devices(an oral thermometer and a pulse oximeter). After the results of the Spree Band were recorded and compared to the Gold Standard measurements, it was determined that the Spree Band was not effective in its measurements. The device is flawed by providing inaccurate measurements, and is altogether unappealing to consumers.
 
<br>


==Experimental Design of Own Device==
==Experimental Design of Own Device==

Revision as of 15:50, 24 September 2016

BME 100 Fall 2016 Home
People
Lab Write-Up 1 | Lab Write-Up 2 | Lab Write-Up 3
Lab Write-Up 4 | Lab Write-Up 5 | Lab Write-Up 6
Course Logistics For Instructors
Photos
Wiki Editing Help


OUR TEAM

Yesenia Barrera Millan
Mariam El Sheikha
Vishvak Rangarajan
Tori Johnson
Reese Morehouse

LAB 3 WRITE-UP

Descriptive Stats and Graph

Heart Rate

Note: The "Gold Standard" heart rate was measured with a pulse oximeter.

Gold Standard - Average: 96.4974026
Spree - Average: 97.65584416

Gold Standard - Standard Deviation: 25.99859918
Spree - Standard Deviation: 27.10634861

Temperature

Note: The "Gold Standard" temperature was measured with an oral thermometer.

Gold Standard - Average: 95.48115152
Spree - Average: 93.79393939

Gold Standard - Standard Deviation: 10.76273631
Spree - Standard Deviation: 12.81217932


Inferential Stats

Heart Rate

P-Value (Paired): 0.298225789
Pearson's R: 0.730784539

Temperature

P-Value (Paired): 9.25843E-05
Pearson's R: 0.797813158


Design Flaws and Recommendations

When comparing the pulse ox heart rate measurements to those of the Spree Band, it is important to look at Pearson's R value. In this care, it is 0.730784539, meaning that there is a weak, positive correlation between the two devices. When comparing the P-Value (Paired) from the T-Test, 0.298225789, it is seen that it is greater than 0.05. This means that there is a significant difference between the measurements.

When comparing the oral thermometer temperature measurements to those of the Spree Band, it is important to look at Pearson's R value. In this case, it is 0.797813158, meaning that there is a weak, positive correlation between the two devices. When comparing the P-Value (Paired) from the T-Test, 9.25843E-05 , it is seen that it is very close to zero.

Based on the experimental results, it is determined that the Spree Band tracker is not effective for the intended purposes. The temperature and the heart rate were recorded from both the Spree (headband) and the Gold Standard Devices(an oral thermometer and a pulse oximeter). After the results of the Spree Band were recorded and compared to the Gold Standard measurements, it was determined that the Spree Band was not effective in its measurements. The device is flawed by providing inaccurate measurements, and is altogether unappealing to consumers.


Experimental Design of Own Device