BME100 f2016:Group16 W8AM L3: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
==Descriptive Stats and Graph== | ==Descriptive Stats and Graph== | ||
Data for Heart Rate: | Data for Heart Rate: | ||
Pearson's R: 0.690806489 | |||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 56: | Line 57: | ||
Data for Temperature: | Data for Temperature: | ||
Pearson's R: 0.218299305 | |||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- |
Revision as of 19:25, 28 September 2016
BME 100 Fall 2016 | Home People Lab Write-Up 1 | Lab Write-Up 2 | Lab Write-Up 3 Lab Write-Up 4 | Lab Write-Up 5 | Lab Write-Up 6 Course Logistics For Instructors Photos Wiki Editing Help | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
OUR TEAM
LAB 3 WRITE-UPDescriptive Stats and GraphData for Heart Rate: Pearson's R: 0.690806489
Data for Temperature: Pearson's R: 0.218299305
Inferential Stats
Design Flaws and RecommendationsThe design of the Spree Headband is not aesthetically pleasing. The device is not appealing to athletes and the common gym goer, because of the device being a large headband that is not fashionable or comfortable to wear while working out. The next flaw is the differences between the Spree and the gold standard for heart rate monitoring. The P value of the Spree for the heart rate monitor was around 0.4, which indicated a significant difference between the Spree and the gold standard for heart rate monitoring.
Experimental Design of Own Device |