BME100 f2016:Group12 W1030AM L5: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(56 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
{| style="wikitable" width="700px"
{| style="wikitable" width="700px"
|- valign="top"
|- valign="top"
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: student]]
| [[Image:AlyC.jpg|100px|thumb|Aly Carlson<br>Group Member]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: student]]
| [[Image:RyanS.jpg|100px|thumb|Ryan Shannon<br>Group Member]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: student]]
| [[Image:RyanF.jpg|100px|thumb|Ryan Faust<br>Group Member]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: student]]
| [[Image:AdinR.jpg|100px|thumb|Adin Roemer<br>Group Member]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: student]]
| [[Image:KyleT.jpg|100px|thumb|Kyle Tappendorf<br>Group Member]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: student]]
|}
|}


Line 28: Line 27:
<!-- Write a summary of your team's experience with pipetting the samples to set up the reaction. Did the pre-lab reading help you? Did you understand the difference between the first and second stop on the pipettor? Did the final reactions have exactly the same amount of liquid? Was there any liquid left in the tubes that the DNA samples and PCR reaction mix? Did you have to change your labeling scheme? -->
<!-- Write a summary of your team's experience with pipetting the samples to set up the reaction. Did the pre-lab reading help you? Did you understand the difference between the first and second stop on the pipettor? Did the final reactions have exactly the same amount of liquid? Was there any liquid left in the tubes that the DNA samples and PCR reaction mix? Did you have to change your labeling scheme? -->


The pre-lab reading was very helpful because it explained in depth how to pipette. We were confident when we began pipetting because of the simulations that we did before class. We all understood the difference between the first and second stop. Before we began using the actual solutions, we practiced with the micropipettor to find the first and seconds stop. There was no noticeable difference in the amount of liquid in the final reactions. There was no liquid left in the tubes that contained the DNA samples and the PCR reaction mix.<br>
The prelab reading was very helpful because it explained in depth how to pipette. We were confident when we began pipetting because of the simulations we did before class. We all understood the difference between the first and second stops. Before we began using the actual solutions, we practiced with the micropipettor using water. After we did our micropipetting, there was no noticeable difference in the amount of liquid in the tubes. There was no liquid left in the tubes that contained the DNA samples and the PCR reaction mix.<br>
We did change our labeling scheme a little. We kept the G12 the same on all the tubes but then we labeled the tubes with patient ID 37106 with the labels 3-1, 3-2, and 3-3. We labeled the tubes with patient ID 54597 with the labels 5-1, 5-2, and 5-3.
We did change our labeling scheme a little. We kept the G12 the same on all the tubes but then we labeled the tubes with patient ID 37106 with the labels 3-1, 3-2, and 3-3. We labeled the tubes with patient ID 54597 with the labels 5-1, 5-2, and 5-3.


Line 36: Line 35:
'''Imaging set-up'''<br>
'''Imaging set-up'''<br>
<!-- INSTRUCTIONS: In the space below, describe in detail how your team set up your device to capture images from the fluorimeter. -->
<!-- INSTRUCTIONS: In the space below, describe in detail how your team set up your device to capture images from the fluorimeter. -->
In the light box, the flourimeter was placed on top of two boxes to prop it up to the height of the camera. A smartphone camera was placed 8 cm away from the light in the flourimeter in a smartphone cradle. The flash was disabled on the camera in order to get a clear picture. The timer was set on the camera for 10 seconds so the light box could be closed and the picture would be taken in darkness. The camera was focused so the picture would be clear. See picture below for complete set up.
In the light box, the flourimeter was placed on top of two boxes to prop it up to the height of the camera. We put the smartphone in the smartphone cradle exactly 8 cm from the light in the flourimeter. The flash was disabled on the camera. The ISO was set to the maximum and the exposure was set to +2.0. The timer on the camera was set for 10 seconds so we would have enough time to close the light box. This ensured that the pictures were always taken in darkness. We also made sure the picture was in focus both before and after each picture was taken. We also took three pictures of each new situation to ensure that they were consistent. See picture below for complete set up.<br>
[[Image:Set_up.jpg‎|250px|]]
[[Image:Set_up.jpg‎|250px|]]


Line 44: Line 43:
<!-- INSTRUCTIONS: In the space below, in your own words write the steps you performed to place samples onto the fluorimeter -->
<!-- INSTRUCTIONS: In the space below, in your own words write the steps you performed to place samples onto the fluorimeter -->


# ''[Instructions: Step one, in your own words]''
# Place slide in flourimeter with rough side up.
# ''[Instructions: Step two, in your own words]''
# Using a micropipettor place 80 mircoliter of SYBR GREEN 1 on the slide between the first two rows. The drop should be round, balled shaped. 
# ''[Instructions: Step three, in your own words]''
# Add 80 microliters of a calf thymus solution to the SYBR GREEN 1 drop.
# ''[Instructions: Step etc., in your own words]''
# Move the slide so the light is in the middle of the drop.
 
# Take a picture using the timer on the smartphone camera while the light box is covering the complete set up so as much light it removed as possible.
#Take three focused pictures of the drop.
#Remove the box being careful to keep the set up in place.
#Use the micropipettor to remove the drop and discard the waste.
#Repeat these sets for each concentration of the calf thymus solution.
<br>
<br>
<!-- Note: Be sure to delete the instruction text in brackets: ''[ ]'' -->
<!-- Note: Be sure to delete the instruction text in brackets: ''[ ]'' -->
Line 54: Line 57:
==Data Collection and Analysis==
==Data Collection and Analysis==


'''Images of High, Low, and Zero Calf Thymus DNA'''
'''Images of High, Low, and Zero Calf Thymus DNA'''<br>
<!-- INSTRUCTIONS: Show ONE image where you drew a circle around the droplet in ImageJ for any image for the (1) 5 μg/mL sample (2) 0.5 μg/mL sample and (3) zero DNA. Please crop your images so that only the drop and a small empty rectangular region around the drop are included. Lots of empty space is a waste of space. -->
<!-- INSTRUCTIONS: Show ONE image where you drew a circle around the droplet in ImageJ for any image for the (1) 5 μg/mL sample (2) 0.5 μg/mL sample and (3) zero DNA. Please crop your images so that only the drop and a small empty rectangular region around the drop are included. Lots of empty space is a waste of space. -->
[[Image:5con.png|150px|]] 5 μg/mL DNA sample<br>


[[Image:25.png|150px|]] 0.5 μg/mL DNA sample<br>
[[Image:0.png‎|150px|]] zero DNA sample<br><br>


'''Calibrator Mean Values'''  
'''Calibrator Mean Values'''  
<!-- INSTRUCTIONS: Show all values from Excel Table 2 from Section 3. '''To save time on typing a new Wiki table from scratch''', use THIS TOOL to auto-generate a Wiki table: http://excel2wiki.net/wikipedia.php. Copy the headers and values from the Excel spreadsheet you made, paste them into the form field, click submit, copy the Wiki code that the tool generated, and replace TABLE GOES HERE (below) with your auto-generated code.  -->
<!-- INSTRUCTIONS: Show all values from Excel Table 2 from Section 3. '''To save time on typing a new Wiki table from scratch''', use THIS TOOL to auto-generate a Wiki table: http://excel2wiki.net/wikipedia.php. Copy the headers and values from the Excel spreadsheet you made, paste them into the form field, click submit, copy the Wiki code that the tool generated, and replace TABLE GOES HERE (below) with your auto-generated code.  -->
 
{| {{table}}
 
|-
TABLE GOES HERE
| '''Initial Conc 2X Calf Thymus DNA (µg/mL)''' || '''Final DNA Conc SYBR Green I (µg/mL)''' || '''Sample Number''' || '''RAWINTDEN DROP - BACKGROUND (Three Images)''' || '''Mean''' || '''Standard Deviation
|-
| 5 || 2.5 || C-1 ||| 4142534 | 4140015 | 4114948 ||| 4123499 || 15251
|-
| 2 || 1 || C-2  ||| 5160256 |  5198834 |  5149773 ||| 5169621 ||25836.46355
|-
| 1 || 0.5 || C-3 ||| 5385062 |  5390132 |  5432693 ||| 5402629||26159.30613
|-
| 0.5 || 0.25 || C-4||| 3515080 |  3543942 |  3550231 ||| 3536417.667|| 18744.5964
|-
| 0.25 || 0.125 || C-5 ||| 4065530 |  4090712 | 4068633 ||| 4074958.333||13731.01097
|-
| 0 || 0 || C-6||| 1304992 |  1306585 |  1269108 ||| 1293561.667 || 21192.46971
|}




'''Calibration curves'''<br>
'''Calibration curves'''<br>
<!-- INSTRUCTIONS: Place images of your Excel plots (2 total) here. -->
<!-- INSTRUCTIONS: Place images of your Excel plots (2 total) here. -->
[[Image:Chart1graph.png‎|600px|]]<br>
[[Image:Chart2graph.png‎|600px|]]<br>
[[Image:Chart3graph.png‎|600px|]]<br>
A third graph is included without the two highest concentrations in order to create a better calibration curve. The standard deviations are included on all three graphs, but they are very small and hardly visible because of the dots.


 
'''Images of Our PCR Negative and Positive Controls'''<br>
 
'''Images of Our PCR Negative and Positive Controls'''
<!-- INSTRUCTIONS: Show ONE image where you drew a circle around the droplet in ImageJ for any image for the (1) Negative control PCR sample AND (2) the Positive control PCR sample.  -->
<!-- INSTRUCTIONS: Show ONE image where you drew a circle around the droplet in ImageJ for any image for the (1) Negative control PCR sample AND (2) the Positive control PCR sample.  -->
[[Image:Positivecontrol.png‎|150px|]]Positive control PCR sample<br>


[[Image:Negativecontol.png‎|150px|]]Negative control PCR sample<br>




Line 78: Line 102:
<!-- INSTRUCTIONS: Show all values from Excel Table 5 from Section 5. '''To save time on typing a new Wiki table from scratch''', use THIS TOOL to auto-generate a Wiki table: http://excel2wiki.net/wikipedia.php. Copy the headers and values from the Excel spreadsheet you made, paste them into the form field, click submit, copy the Wiki code that the tool generated, and replace TABLE GOES HERE (below) with your auto-generated code.  -->
<!-- INSTRUCTIONS: Show all values from Excel Table 5 from Section 5. '''To save time on typing a new Wiki table from scratch''', use THIS TOOL to auto-generate a Wiki table: http://excel2wiki.net/wikipedia.php. Copy the headers and values from the Excel spreadsheet you made, paste them into the form field, click submit, copy the Wiki code that the tool generated, and replace TABLE GOES HERE (below) with your auto-generated code.  -->


TABLE GOES HERE
{| {{table}}
|-
| '''PCR Product TUBE LABEL''' || '''MEAN (of RAWINTDEN DROP - BACKGROUND)''' || '''PCR Product Concentration (µg /mL)''' || '''Total Dilution (µL)''' || '''Initial PCR Product Concentration'''
|-
| Positive|| 4619611.67|| 0.654902918|| 0.0833|| 0.054553413
|-
| Negative||1548873.67||-0.112781583||0.0833||-0.009394706
|-
| Patient 3-1||4840513||0.710128250||0.0833||0.059153683
|-
| Patient 3-2 ||1446287.67 ||-0.138428083|| 0.0833|| -0.011531059
|-
| Patient 3-3 ||5441817||0.860454250 ||0.0833||0.071675839
|-
| Patient 5-1 ||5889107.67 ||0.972276918||0.0833||0.080990667
|-
| Patient 5-2 ||5234250.67 ||0.808562668 ||0.0833||0.06735327
|-
| Patient 5-3 ||5375391 ||0.843847750 ||0.0833||0.070292518
|}
 




Line 84: Line 128:
'''PCR Results: Summary'''
'''PCR Results: Summary'''
<!-- INSTRUCTIONS: You completed 8 PCR reactions and used the SYBR Green I staining and imaging technique to measure the amount of amplified DNA in each PCR reaction. You used a standard curve (based on known concentrations of calf thymus DNA) to convert INTDEN values into DNA concentration. Your positive control and negative control samples should be used as '''threshold''' values for determining whether an unknown (patient) sample is truly positive or negative. Replace the underscore with your calculated initial concentration values.-->
<!-- INSTRUCTIONS: You completed 8 PCR reactions and used the SYBR Green I staining and imaging technique to measure the amount of amplified DNA in each PCR reaction. You used a standard curve (based on known concentrations of calf thymus DNA) to convert INTDEN values into DNA concentration. Your positive control and negative control samples should be used as '''threshold''' values for determining whether an unknown (patient) sample is truly positive or negative. Replace the underscore with your calculated initial concentration values.-->
* Our positive control PCR result was ____ μg/mL
* Our positive control PCR result was 0.055 μg/mL
* Our negative control PCR result was ____ μg/mL
* Our negative control PCR result was -0.009 μg/mL




<u>Observed results</u>
<u>Observed results</u>
<!-- INSTRUCTIONS: Replace the underscore with each patient ID. After the colon, write both a qualitative (what the images looked like) and a quantitative description (μg/mL) of what you observed -->
<!-- INSTRUCTIONS: Replace the underscore with each patient ID. After the colon, write both a qualitative (what the images looked like) and a quantitative description (μg/mL) of what you observed -->
* Patient _____ :  
* Patient 37106: Two of the three samples were very bright and looked similar to the positive PCR result. The third image was darker and looked more like the negative PCR result. The initial PCR product concentrations were calculated to be 0.059 μg/mL, 0.072 μg/mL, and -0.011 μg/mL.
* Patient _____ :
* Patient 54597: All three samples were very bright and looked similar to the positive PCR result. The initial PCR product concentrations were calculated to be 0.081 μg/mL, 0.067 μg/mL, and 0.070 μg/mL.




<u>Conclusions</u>
<u>Conclusions</u>
<!-- INSTRUCTIONS: Compare each patient's results to the positive control value and the negative control value. Draw a final conclusion for each patient (positive or negative) and explain why you made that conclusion. -->
<!-- INSTRUCTIONS: Compare each patient's results to the positive control value and the negative control value. Draw a final conclusion for each patient (positive or negative) and explain why you made that conclusion. -->
* Patient _____ :
* Patient 37106: Two of this patient's values were close to the positive PCR result so we conclude that this patient is positive. The third value that was similar to the negative PCR result could have been an experimental error which gave incorrect results.
* Patient _____ :
* Patient 54597: All three trials of this patient were close to the positive PCR result so we conclude that this patient is positive.





Latest revision as of 12:05, 8 November 2016

BME 100 Fall 2016 Home
People
Lab Write-Up 1 | Lab Write-Up 2 | Lab Write-Up 3
Lab Write-Up 4 | Lab Write-Up 5 | Lab Write-Up 6
Course Logistics For Instructors
Photos
Wiki Editing Help

OUR TEAM

Aly Carlson
Group Member
Ryan Shannon
Group Member
Ryan Faust
Group Member
Adin Roemer
Group Member
Kyle Tappendorf
Group Member


LAB 5 WRITE-UP

PCR Reaction Report

The prelab reading was very helpful because it explained in depth how to pipette. We were confident when we began pipetting because of the simulations we did before class. We all understood the difference between the first and second stops. Before we began using the actual solutions, we practiced with the micropipettor using water. After we did our micropipetting, there was no noticeable difference in the amount of liquid in the tubes. There was no liquid left in the tubes that contained the DNA samples and the PCR reaction mix.
We did change our labeling scheme a little. We kept the G12 the same on all the tubes but then we labeled the tubes with patient ID 37106 with the labels 3-1, 3-2, and 3-3. We labeled the tubes with patient ID 54597 with the labels 5-1, 5-2, and 5-3.

Fluorimeter Procedure

Imaging set-up
In the light box, the flourimeter was placed on top of two boxes to prop it up to the height of the camera. We put the smartphone in the smartphone cradle exactly 8 cm from the light in the flourimeter. The flash was disabled on the camera. The ISO was set to the maximum and the exposure was set to +2.0. The timer on the camera was set for 10 seconds so we would have enough time to close the light box. This ensured that the pictures were always taken in darkness. We also made sure the picture was in focus both before and after each picture was taken. We also took three pictures of each new situation to ensure that they were consistent. See picture below for complete set up.


Placing Samples onto the Fluorimeter

  1. Place slide in flourimeter with rough side up.
  2. Using a micropipettor place 80 mircoliter of SYBR GREEN 1 on the slide between the first two rows. The drop should be round, balled shaped.
  3. Add 80 microliters of a calf thymus solution to the SYBR GREEN 1 drop.
  4. Move the slide so the light is in the middle of the drop.
  5. Take a picture using the timer on the smartphone camera while the light box is covering the complete set up so as much light it removed as possible.
  6. Take three focused pictures of the drop.
  7. Remove the box being careful to keep the set up in place.
  8. Use the micropipettor to remove the drop and discard the waste.
  9. Repeat these sets for each concentration of the calf thymus solution.


Data Collection and Analysis

Images of High, Low, and Zero Calf Thymus DNA
5 μg/mL DNA sample

0.5 μg/mL DNA sample

zero DNA sample

Calibrator Mean Values

Initial Conc 2X Calf Thymus DNA (µg/mL) Final DNA Conc SYBR Green I (µg/mL) Sample Number RAWINTDEN DROP - BACKGROUND (Three Images) Mean Standard Deviation
5 2.5 C-1 4142534 | 4140015 | 4114948 4123499 15251
2 1 C-2 5160256 | 5198834 | 5149773 5169621 25836.46355
1 0.5 C-3 5385062 | 5390132 | 5432693 5402629 26159.30613
0.5 0.25 C-4 3515080 | 3543942 | 3550231 3536417.667 18744.5964
0.25 0.125 C-5 4065530 | 4090712 | 4068633 4074958.333 13731.01097
0 0 C-6 1304992 | 1306585 | 1269108 1293561.667 21192.46971


Calibration curves



A third graph is included without the two highest concentrations in order to create a better calibration curve. The standard deviations are included on all three graphs, but they are very small and hardly visible because of the dots.

Images of Our PCR Negative and Positive Controls
Positive control PCR sample

Negative control PCR sample


PCR Results: PCR concentrations solved

PCR Product TUBE LABEL MEAN (of RAWINTDEN DROP - BACKGROUND) PCR Product Concentration (µg /mL) Total Dilution (µL) Initial PCR Product Concentration
Positive 4619611.67 0.654902918 0.0833 0.054553413
Negative 1548873.67 -0.112781583 0.0833 -0.009394706
Patient 3-1 4840513 0.710128250 0.0833 0.059153683
Patient 3-2 1446287.67 -0.138428083 0.0833 -0.011531059
Patient 3-3 5441817 0.860454250 0.0833 0.071675839
Patient 5-1 5889107.67 0.972276918 0.0833 0.080990667
Patient 5-2 5234250.67 0.808562668 0.0833 0.06735327
Patient 5-3 5375391 0.843847750 0.0833 0.070292518



PCR Results: Summary

  • Our positive control PCR result was 0.055 μg/mL
  • Our negative control PCR result was -0.009 μg/mL


Observed results

  • Patient 37106: Two of the three samples were very bright and looked similar to the positive PCR result. The third image was darker and looked more like the negative PCR result. The initial PCR product concentrations were calculated to be 0.059 μg/mL, 0.072 μg/mL, and -0.011 μg/mL.
  • Patient 54597: All three samples were very bright and looked similar to the positive PCR result. The initial PCR product concentrations were calculated to be 0.081 μg/mL, 0.067 μg/mL, and 0.070 μg/mL.


Conclusions

  • Patient 37106: Two of this patient's values were close to the positive PCR result so we conclude that this patient is positive. The third value that was similar to the negative PCR result could have been an experimental error which gave incorrect results.
  • Patient 54597: All three trials of this patient were close to the positive PCR result so we conclude that this patient is positive.