BME100 f2016:Group11 W8AM L3

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
BME 100 Fall 2016 Home
People
Lab Write-Up 1 | Lab Write-Up 2 | Lab Write-Up 3
Lab Write-Up 4 | Lab Write-Up 5 | Lab Write-Up 6
Course Logistics For Instructors
Photos
Wiki Editing Help


OUR TEAM

Name: Elmer Correa
Name: Zach
Name: Erik
Name: Isaac
Name: Maria Predtechenskaya
Name: Your name

LAB 3 WRITE-UP

Descriptive Stats and Graph

Temperature Measuring Spree Device:

Average (Gold Standard): 96.65269939

Average (Spree): 95.5308642

Standard Deviation (Gold Standard): 1.918462545

Standard Deviation (Spree): 0.8703782993

Count (Gold Standard): 326

Count (Spree): 324

Standard Error (Gold Standard): 0.1062538132

Standard Error (Spree): 0.04835434996


P-value: 1.097E-21

Significant? Yes!


Pearson's r-value: 0.1927980889



Heart Rhythm Measuring Device:




Inferential Stats

Temperature Device The spree device produces results significantly different from the gold standard device. The p-value is much smaller than 0.05, meaning that the differences are in fact statistically significant. In other words, the data from the spree is very different from the gold standard. When comparing the two device measurements through the Pearson's value, which is 0.193, we see that it is much smaller than 0.4 (this is the minimum acceptable value showing correlation). From the data, we can infer that the spree device is inferior in quality to the gold standard and should not be sold in any market due to underlying technical problems causing the data to stray from those of the gold standard.


Heart Rhythm Device No need for an analyis here, just plop the data down and do the rest in the section below




Design Flaws and Recommendations



Experimental Design of Own Device