BME100 f2016:Group11 W8AM L3

BME 100 Fall 2016	Home People Lab Write-Up 1 | Lab Write-Up 2 | Lab Write-Up 3 Lab Write-Up 4 | Lab Write-Up 5 | Lab Write-Up 6 Course Logistics For Instructors Photos Wiki Editing Help
OUR TEAM Name: Elmer Correa Name: Zach Name: Erik Name: Isaac Name: Maria Predtechenskaya Name: Your name LAB 3 WRITE-UP Descriptive Stats and Graph Temperature Measuring Spree Device: Average (Gold Standard): 96.65269939 Average (Spree): 95.5308642 Standard Deviation (Gold Standard): 1.918462545 Standard Deviation (Spree): 0.8703782993 Count (Gold Standard): 326 Count (Spree): 324 Standard Error (Gold Standard): 0.1062538132 Standard Error (Spree): 0.04835434996 Heart Rhythm Measuring Device: Inferential Stats Temperature Device P-value: 1.097E-21 Significant? Yes! Pearson's r-value: 0.1927980889 (Below minimum .4 required to conclude statistical correlation) Heart Rhythm Device No need for an analyis here, just plop the data down and do the rest in the section below Design Flaws and Recommendations Temperature Device The spree device produces results significantly different from the gold standard device. The p-value is much smaller than 0.05, meaning that the differences are in fact statistically significant. In other words, the data from the spree is very different from the gold standard. When comparing the two device measurements through the Pearson's value, which is 0.193, we see that it is much smaller than 0.4 (this is the minimum acceptable value showing correlation). From the data, we can infer that the spree device is inferior in quality to the gold standard and should not be sold in any market due to underlying technical problems causing the data to stray from those of the gold standard. Heart Rhythm Device Experimental Design of Own Device