BME100 f2014:Group9 L6: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 50: Line 50:
'''TinkerCAD'''<br>
'''TinkerCAD'''<br>
<!-- Instructions: Write a short summary (up to five sentences) of the TinkerCAD tool and how you used it during the Computer-Aided Design lab -->
<!-- Instructions: Write a short summary (up to five sentences) of the TinkerCAD tool and how you used it during the Computer-Aided Design lab -->
TinkerCAD allowed the group to make a 3D visual of the PCR machine using online templates uploaded from www.thingiverse.com. Using simple shapes and ergonomic tools, manipulation of the original design was effortless. Since the dimensions are displayed, dragging the corner of any shape to change the length, width, and depth allowed quick and precise measurements to fit the scale needed. Of all the features, the movable grid plane was the most efficient, allowing the fast placement of objects on any surface of the design.




Line 55: Line 57:


<!-- Instructions: Show an image of your TinkerCAD design here -->
<!-- Instructions: Show an image of your TinkerCAD design here -->
[[Image:GROUP9PCR.png|border|380px|]]


<!-- Instructions: Under the image, write a short paragraph describing your design. Why did you choose this design? How is it different from the original OpenPCR design? --><br>
<!-- Instructions: Under the image, write a short paragraph describing your design. Why did you choose this design? How is it different from the original OpenPCR design? --><br>
Line 64: Line 67:
==Feature 1: Consumables Kit==
==Feature 1: Consumables Kit==
<!-- Instruction 1: Summarize how the consumables (liquid reagents and small plastics) will be packaged in your kit. You may add a schematic image. An image is OPTIONAL and will not get bonus points, but it will make your report look awesome and easy to score. -->
<!-- Instruction 1: Summarize how the consumables (liquid reagents and small plastics) will be packaged in your kit. You may add a schematic image. An image is OPTIONAL and will not get bonus points, but it will make your report look awesome and easy to score. -->
 
The consumables kit in our improved PCR system will be the exact same as before, except with double the components. Included in the package will be the test tubes, SYBR Green I dye, and PCR mix. A micropipettor tool with tips will be in the packaging as well. A holster for all of the samples will also be included.
<!-- Instruction 2: IF your consumables packaging plan addresses any major weakness(es), explain how in an additional paragraph. -->
<!-- Instruction 2: IF your consumables packaging plan addresses any major weakness(es), explain how in an additional paragraph. -->



Latest revision as of 20:36, 25 November 2014

BME 100 Fall 2014 Home
People
Lab Write-Up 1 | Lab Write-Up 2 | Lab Write-Up 3
Lab Write-Up 4 | Lab Write-Up 5 | Lab Write-Up 6
Course Logistics For Instructors
Photos
Wiki Editing Help


OUR COMPANY

Kevin Koza
Evan Targioni
Logan Murphy
Phil Liles
Cameron Hiller
Tiffany Gong


LAB 6 WRITE-UP

Bayesian Statistics

Overview of the Original Diagnosis System

In the BME100 lab, multiple teams of students diagnosed 68 total patients to analyze their DNA to determine if they had a specific disease. Each group of students received all equipment necessary to perform PCR on the two patients, such as the samples themselves, the PCR mix, machine, and pipettor. The procedure for PCR was to combine a specific amount of the PCR mix with the target DNA by using the micropipettor, and place the samples in the OpenPCR machine. Multiple samples for each patient were run in the machine to prevent error. Two groups shared one OpenPCR machine, for a total analysis of 4 samples. Overall, the labor was divided among 34 groups for the analysis of all samples. Once the PCR was completed, the samples were added to a slide with SYBR Green I dye, and placed on a fluorimeter. This allowed the groups to analyze the amount of green fluorescence produced through the use of smartphone cameras and ImageJ software. Other samples with a positive and negative control were also analyzed, so that the patient samples could be compared to the ImageJ results of the controls. Three photos of each sample were analyzed, and the data from ImageJ allowed us to determine if the patient tested positive for the SNP. The results for positive and negative results, along with the determination of the presence of the SNP can be seen in the following:

asdf


What Bayes Statistics Imply about This Diagnostic Approach


Calculations 1 and 2 discuss the sensitivity and specificity of the system regarding the ability to detect the disease. Calculation 1 shows the probability that the patient will conclude positive, given a positive PCR test. This result was approaching 100%, showing that it is likely that the patient has the disease if they tested positive. Calculation 2 shows the probability that the patient will conclude negative, given a negative PCR test. The value for this was also near 100%. Error for this analysis could be involved in the ImageJ calibration or sample analysis, along with PCR contamination, or failure to properly determine correlation between the samples and the controls from ImageJ data.


Calculations 3 and 4 discuss the sensitivity and specificity of the system regarding the ability to predict the disease. Calculation 3 shows the probability that the patient will develop the disease, given a positive test. The Bayes value for this was low. Calculation 4 shows the probability that the patient will not develop the disease, given a negative test. The value for this was approximately 50%, meaning that it is inconclusive. Once again, error for these results...

Computer-Aided Design

TinkerCAD

TinkerCAD allowed the group to make a 3D visual of the PCR machine using online templates uploaded from www.thingiverse.com. Using simple shapes and ergonomic tools, manipulation of the original design was effortless. Since the dimensions are displayed, dragging the corner of any shape to change the length, width, and depth allowed quick and precise measurements to fit the scale needed. Of all the features, the movable grid plane was the most efficient, allowing the fast placement of objects on any surface of the design.


Our Design


Our design changed the OpenPCR machine to enable PCR on 32 samples rather than 16. This allows for more tests to be run quickly, maximizing efficiency of PCR. Also, since more samples can be run, one machine can serve the purpose of many, so the costs can be cut down.


Feature 1: Consumables Kit

The consumables kit in our improved PCR system will be the exact same as before, except with double the components. Included in the package will be the test tubes, SYBR Green I dye, and PCR mix. A micropipettor tool with tips will be in the packaging as well. A holster for all of the samples will also be included.

Feature 2: Hardware - PCR Machine & Fluorimeter

The improved PCR machine will be able to run up to 32 samples at once. This allows for testing to be run quickly and more efficiently than before. Also, the improved fluorimeter system will have a cradle and camera in a set position from the sample slide. This will eliminate or marginalize variance in the photographs of the samples, thus improving accuracy of the testing. Also, ImageJ will be easier to run on these photographs because the samples should be in the same position every time.