BME100 f2014:Group33 L2

BME 100 Fall 2014	Home People Lab Write-Up 1 | Lab Write-Up 2 | Lab Write-Up 3 Lab Write-Up 4 | Lab Write-Up 5 | Lab Write-Up 6 Course Logistics For Instructors Photos Wiki Editing Help
OUR TEAM Name: Emigdio Ruiz Esquivel Name: John Cunningham Name: Wandasun Sihenath Name: Chris Adams Name: Tim Snelling Name: Breanna Falcon LAB 2 WRITE-UP Descriptive Statistics Experiment 1 (Rats) Experiment 2 (Humans) Results Experiment 1 (Rats) ‎Experiment 2 (Humans) Analysis Experiment 1 Rats Experiment 2 Humans We used a t-test for the rats because they can be monitored when given the dosage and the Anova test was used on the humans because they have to be tested over a multitude of conditions because of the activities or numerous other things that they could subject themselves to in a day and can tell how durable and well the treatment will work. Summary/Discussion The results indicated that the Inflammotin protein increased in both rats and humans as the dosage increased. The extent to which the dosage affected each group also varied. In the rats, the Inflammotin levels increased to approximately 11 pg/ml when they were given a dosage of 10mg. The effect of LPS on Humans was higher when compared to the rat scale since rats and humans have different body structures and do not function in the same way. There was a significant jump in the human body just by changing the dosage from 10mg to 15mg. The standard error is also higher in humans than rats because the rats can be contained which means that they can be properly monitored. Whereas in a human, the standard error is greater because they could be doing other things such as: taking medication, vitamins or eating certain foods which could bring in a greater number of variables that could affect the experiment and skew the data.