BME100 f2014:Group28 L6: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
| [[Image:Kyleb.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: Kyle Brague]]
| [[Image:Kyleb.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: Kyle Brague]]
| [[Image:10494643_740815502642515_2285125575492611880_n.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: Brandt Hansen]]
| [[Image:10494643_740815502642515_2285125575492611880_n.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: Brandt Hansen]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: student]]
| [[Image:1185360 513591082054595 925725876 n.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: Diego Reyes]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: student]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: student]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: student]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: student]]
Line 59: Line 59:


<!-- Instruction 2: IF your consumables packaging plan addresses any major weakness(es), explain how in an additional paragraph. -->
<!-- Instruction 2: IF your consumables packaging plan addresses any major weakness(es), explain how in an additional paragraph. -->
Our design does not change the existing consumables already in place. our design effects the body of the PCR machine in order to increase efficiency when the machine is heating and cooling. So the consumables will remain standard and will not deviate from the original packing and preparation.


==Feature 2: Hardware - PCR Machine & Fluorimeter==
==Feature 2: Hardware - PCR Machine & Fluorimeter==

Revision as of 17:42, 20 November 2014

BME 100 Fall 2014 Home
People
Lab Write-Up 1 | Lab Write-Up 2 | Lab Write-Up 3
Lab Write-Up 4 | Lab Write-Up 5 | Lab Write-Up 6
Course Logistics For Instructors
Photos
Wiki Editing Help


OUR COMPANY

Name: Andrew W. Hamidy
Name: Kyle Brague
Name: Brandt Hansen
Name: Diego Reyes
Name: student
Name: student

phlapps

LAB 6 WRITE-UP

Bayesian Statistics

Overview of the Original Diagnosis System The goal of this lab was to take DNA from patients and do PCR to replicate the certain portion of DNA being tested. The test was to determine whether a diseases was present or not. The labor for this lab was split up between 34 teams diagnosing 68 patients. This means that 2 patients were given to each group. Each team had 6 students in them. To prevent error, many things were taken into account. For example, each team was given 3 replicates for each patient. This helps prevent error because there is more data, and with more data there is a less chance that error will occur. Another precaution taken to prevent error was that each patient had a control sample to properly calibrate the ImageJ. Finally, in order to help prevent error, multiple photos were taken of the drops at each percent of DNA to be able to choose which looked the best. For the final results, of the 68 patients, 54 patients had successful results, 8 patients had inconclusive results, and 6 patients were left blank(due to the groups not inputting their data).

What Bayes Statistics Imply about This Diagnostic Approach


Computer-Aided Design

TinkerCAD


Our Design


Our Design includes vents that automatically open and close based on the temperature inside the PCR machine. This will improve energy and cost efficiency since less energy will be lost to the surroundings. The vents are automatically controlled by servos that take information from a temperature inside the machine. We chose this design because we realized how ignored vents are in contemporary electronics.


Feature 1: Consumables Kit

Our design does not change the existing consumables already in place. our design effects the body of the PCR machine in order to increase efficiency when the machine is heating and cooling. So the consumables will remain standard and will not deviate from the original packing and preparation.

Feature 2: Hardware - PCR Machine & Fluorimeter