BME100 f2014:Group18 L6: Difference between revisions
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
'''TinkerCAD'''<br> | '''TinkerCAD'''<br> | ||
<!-- Instructions: Write a short summary (up to five sentences) of the TinkerCAD tool and how you used it during the Computer-Aided Design lab --> | <!-- Instructions: Write a short summary (up to five sentences) of the TinkerCAD tool and how you used it during the Computer-Aided Design lab --> | ||
<br> Using the TinkerCAD program, our group was able to refer to the standard open PCR machine | <br> Using the TinkerCAD program, our group was able to refer to and analyze the standard open PCR machine in 3-D to develop an idea for what ways it could be improved. With each idea of improvement, the implications of the change were discussed. For example, we considered if the PCR machine was designed to be able to hold more samples, the process would take longer, and most likely need another heating/cooling element, thus causing a need for a larger powered circuit board. In the end, we decided as a group that we should add another cooling element to the existing PCR design. This would not significantly change the design of the PCR machine but it would allow for the final PCR reaction to be reached quicker and more efficiently. | ||
'''Our Design'''<br> | '''Our Design'''<br> | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
[[Image:updated_PCR.png|500px|Description of image]] | [[Image:updated_PCR.png|500px|Description of image]] | ||
<!-- Instructions: Under the image, write a short paragraph describing your design. Why did you choose this design? How is it different from the original OpenPCR design? --><br> | <!-- Instructions: Under the image, write a short paragraph describing your design. Why did you choose this design? How is it different from the original OpenPCR design? --><br> | ||
<br> We added a cooling element to the Open PCR machine. The process | <br> We added a cooling element to the Open PCR machine. The process for the PCR reaction requires a cooling stage, and this added element allows for the test tube samples to reach the cool temperature in shorter time and more efficiently. Ultimately, it is reducing the total time required for the PCR reaction. | ||
<br> | <br> |
Revision as of 23:06, 25 November 2014
BME 100 Fall 2014 | Home People Lab Write-Up 1 | Lab Write-Up 2 | Lab Write-Up 3 Lab Write-Up 4 | Lab Write-Up 5 | Lab Write-Up 6 Course Logistics For Instructors Photos Wiki Editing Help | ||||||
OUR COMPANY
LAB 6 WRITE-UPBayesian StatisticsOverview of the Original Diagnosis System
What Bayes Statistics Imply about This Diagnostic Approach Computer-Aided DesignTinkerCAD Our Design
Feature 2: Consumables KitWe will hold the SYBR Green 1 in light blocking packaging which would replace the original tin foil used in the lab. The packaging would also be water proof to protect from cross contamination. The buffers needed to be sterile to ensure the cleanliness and accuracy of the lab. The packaging for the micropippeor tips could be cut in half that way they could all be used in one sitting for the lab and that would allow for the most sterile process. Feature 3: Hardware - PCR Machine & FluorimeterFor the fluorimeter we would include an adjustable camera holder that will allow for varying heights to have the camera flush with the side of the machine. We would also change the folding lid of the fluorimeter that way it allow for complete darkness, but still allow for a clear image. The lack of these two features in the existing fluorimeter design that we used caused some problems. Without the adjustable camera holder, each change in camera while testing to see who's worked better, the entire fluorimeter set up had to be redone. Also, lowering the flap with the camera on timer, caused glare and problems due to the camera adjusting to the light. In order to get a clear picture, the lab had to be slightly compromised and allowed to the flap to be open partially allowing some light to shine into the fluorimeter.
|