Anthony J. Wavrin Week 11: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(added to m&m) |
(added figure and table 1) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
*The growth rate of the yeast was constant at 0.03 h-1, which is 75% max growth rate at 12C and 10% max growth rate at 30C. | *The growth rate of the yeast was constant at 0.03 h-1, which is 75% max growth rate at 12C and 10% max growth rate at 30C. | ||
*The study used a pair-wise analysis of the DNA microarray data for transcription levels and used Fisher's exact test with a Bonferroni correction for overrepresentation of transcription-factor binding sites. | *The study used a pair-wise analysis of the DNA microarray data for transcription levels and used Fisher's exact test with a Bonferroni correction for overrepresentation of transcription-factor binding sites. | ||
===Results== | |||
====Table 1==== | |||
*Table 1 shows that the chemostat conditions were either ammonia or glucose limiting by reporting the residual ammonia or glucose, respectively. | |||
*Growth efficiency between the yeast at 12C and 30C was also relatively constant. | |||
*Utilization of glucose and production of ethanol and carbon dioxide are not severely different between 12ºC and 30ºC. | |||
====Figure 1==== | |||
*Figure 1 shows the overlap between significant changes in the transcriptome by gene of the yeast limited by either glucose or ammonia. | |||
*In total, 1065 genes were significantly "regulated" but, only 235 genes were consistent in both conditions. | |||
*This is a visual representation of genes that may be nutrient limiting specifically regulated. | |||
====Figure 2==== |
Revision as of 21:33, 3 April 2013
Definitions
Outline
Introduction
- Microorganisms are susceptible to temperature changes due to their inability to move, thus they must have physiological means to adapt to these changing environments.
- The temperature situation tested in this study was the effect of cold temperatures, termed cold shock.
- Recent studies have also looked at cold shock in yeast but, used a method of growing them in batch cultures.
- In this study, yeast were grown in chemostats to keep the conditions more constant.
- The yeast's adaptation to cold shock is determined by looking at changes in the transcriptome.
Materials and Methods
- The yeast are grown in four different conditions:
- 12C with glucose as a limiting nutrient (experimental)
- 30C with glucose as a limiting nutrient (control)
- 12C with ammonium as a limiting nutrient (experimental)
- 30C with ammonium as a limiting nutrient (control)
- Two different limiting nutrients were used to censor the nutrient dependent changes in the transcriptome.
- The chemostat had a 1.0 liter culture of defined synthetic media with either glucose or ammonia as a limiting nutrient.
- The yeast strain used was CEN.PK113-7D (MATa) and was in a haploid state.
- The growth rate of the yeast was constant at 0.03 h-1, which is 75% max growth rate at 12C and 10% max growth rate at 30C.
- The study used a pair-wise analysis of the DNA microarray data for transcription levels and used Fisher's exact test with a Bonferroni correction for overrepresentation of transcription-factor binding sites.
=Results
Table 1
- Table 1 shows that the chemostat conditions were either ammonia or glucose limiting by reporting the residual ammonia or glucose, respectively.
- Growth efficiency between the yeast at 12C and 30C was also relatively constant.
- Utilization of glucose and production of ethanol and carbon dioxide are not severely different between 12ºC and 30ºC.
Figure 1
- Figure 1 shows the overlap between significant changes in the transcriptome by gene of the yeast limited by either glucose or ammonia.
- In total, 1065 genes were significantly "regulated" but, only 235 genes were consistent in both conditions.
- This is a visual representation of genes that may be nutrient limiting specifically regulated.