Andrew Hessel: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
== About ==
== About ==


I work to promote synthetic biology technology and education, open source biology, and the international Genetically Engineered Machines (iGEM) program.  Except I don't really work.  It's more what I am compelled to do, and I don't really need a job, so it's more like play.     I interact with a diverse range of people and organizations and really enjoy making introductions and connections.
I work to promote synthetic biology technology and education, open source biology, and the international Genetically Engineered Machines (iGEM) program.  Except I don't really work.  It's more what I am compelled to do -- and because it's fun, it feels like play. I interact with a diverse range of people and organizations and enjoy making introductions and connections.


To my mind, DNA is a programming language for processors we call cells.  The new field of synthetic biology facilitates the writing of DNA-based programs for biological systems, leading to outputs ranging from single proteins, to new metabolic pathways, to fully synthetic cells or organisms.  Since the designs are created by humans, one might think of this as memetic engineering.  This is a powerful new technology with far-reaching economic, social, ethical, and legal implications.  It's also easier for software engineers than most biologists to appreciate the core concepts.
I consider DNA a programming language for processors we call cells.  Synthetic biology facilitates the writing of DNA-based programs for biological systems, leading to applications that range from single proteins, to new metabolic pathways, to fully synthetic cells or organisms.  Designed and/or selected by humans, one might think of this as memetic engineering and/or evolutionProgramming cells, although similar to programming computers, comes with far greater economic, social, ethical, and legal implications.  This makes the technology important.  I've also learned that it's easier to introduce the core concepts to those familiar with software engineering concepts than to classically trained biologists.


I advocate the use of open source for programming DNA, since the free exchange of ideas maximizes innovation and because transparency allows for wide oversight. In software development, open source has also led to robust code, highly skilled developer communities, and non-monopolistic pricing -- in other words, really good things for end users.  If the same results can be achieved in biological engineering, open source biology could potentially create a more diversified and sustainable biotechnology industry.  These ideas are explored in ''[http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/opensources2/toc.html Open Sources 2.0]'', which is published by O'Reilly and is, ironically and unfortunately, not open source.  I'll send you a PDF if you ask for one.
For programming DNA, I advocated open source, for two reasons.  First, because the free exchange of ideas seems to maximize the rate of innovation.  Second, because I believe that transparency is the best ideology for managing complex systems. For example, in software development, open source has also led to robust code (security), highly skilled developer communities (education), and non-monopolistic pricing (fair economies).  If transferable to biological engineering, open source could lead to a more diversified, and more sustainable, biotechnology industry.  These ideas are explored in ''[http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/opensources2/toc.html Open Sources 2.0]'', which is published by O'Reilly and is, ironically, not open source.  I'll send you a PDF if you ask for one.




== Background ==
== Background ==


I detoured from a PhD in genomics to explore a position with the Amgen Institute, a 120 person research facility located in Toronto, Canada, and I never looked backWorking as a bridge between the Institute, Amgen Canada, and Amgen Inc. (Thousand Oaks, CA), I facilitated dozens of advanced research projects involving microarrays, genetic sequence analysis, and data mining.  Today, the institute, no longer affiliated with Amgen, is known as the [http://www.campbellfamilyinstitute.com/Pages/Home/HomePage.aspx Campbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research].  In 2002, I co-founded of Miikana Therapeutics and helped, a drug development company.  I left after the company began operations to explore my synthetic biology interests.  In December, 2005, Miikana was sold to Entremed for $21 million plus milestones.
In 1995, I was hired away from a PhD in genomics by Amgen, Inc. to provide bioinformatics support for the newly formed Amgen Institute, a 120 person research facility located in Toronto, Canada.  There, I facilitated dozens of advanced research projects involving microarrays, genetic sequence analysis, and data mining, and also discovered a knack for strategy and project management(Today, the institute is unaffiliated with Amgen and known as the [http://www.campbellfamilyinstitute.ca/ Campbell Family Cancer Research Institute].) In 2002, I co-founded of Miikana Therapeutics, a drug development company.  I resigned after the company operations were stable to explore my synthetic biology interests.  In December, 2005, Miikana was sold to Entremed for $21 million plus milestones.


Since 2003, I have focused my attention mainly on synthetic biology and open source biology.  As part of this effort, I am currently founding an open source biotechnology company that will make breakthrough n=1 cancer therapeutics and give them away for free -- I will elaborate more on this soon, but I can tell you the company development is coming along slowly and surely.  (It's a long process getting people up to speed with such unconventional drug development ideas, but so encouraging, too, when they begin to get it.) While I generally work in Canada, I travel frequently and am happy to speak on these subjects to individuals or groups, schedule permitting.  I take enough flights to feel guilty about my carbon load.
Since 2003, I have focused my attention on open source synthetic biology.  As part of my  broad education and outreach agenda, I am founding an open source biotechnology company that will make breakthrough, personalized cancer therapeutics and give them away for free.  The development process has been slower than expected, but steady.  I am based in Alberta, Canada, which is an ideal test bed for new technologies, but travel widely.
 
My professional role models are the fictional Nick Haflinger and, more recently, Manfred Macx, a venture altruist:
 
<font size = 1>"Manfred is at the peak of his profession, which is essentially coming up with whacky but workable ideas and giving them to people who will make fortunes with them. He does this for free, gratis. In return, he has virtual immunity from the tyranny of cash; money is a symptom of poverty, after all, and Manfred never has to pay for anything."    ''-- Accelerando'', by Charles Stross (2005)</font>
 
My work has been supported by the University of Oklahoma, the University of Toronto, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the Alberta Ingenuity Fund, among others.


My work has been supported by the University of Oklahoma, the University of Toronto, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the [http://www.albertaingenuity.ca Alberta Ingenuity Fund].  My professional role model is the fictional Manfred Macx, a venture altruist.  Big thanks to Charles Stross for writing Accelerando.


== Contact Information ==
== Contact Information ==

Revision as of 10:28, 4 July 2008



Andrew Hessel, September 2007, Nevada
hi-res photo of me

About

I work to promote synthetic biology technology and education, open source biology, and the international Genetically Engineered Machines (iGEM) program. Except I don't really work. It's more what I am compelled to do -- and because it's fun, it feels like play. I interact with a diverse range of people and organizations and enjoy making introductions and connections.

I consider DNA a programming language for processors we call cells. Synthetic biology facilitates the writing of DNA-based programs for biological systems, leading to applications that range from single proteins, to new metabolic pathways, to fully synthetic cells or organisms. Designed and/or selected by humans, one might think of this as memetic engineering and/or evolution. Programming cells, although similar to programming computers, comes with far greater economic, social, ethical, and legal implications. This makes the technology important. I've also learned that it's easier to introduce the core concepts to those familiar with software engineering concepts than to classically trained biologists.

For programming DNA, I advocated open source, for two reasons. First, because the free exchange of ideas seems to maximize the rate of innovation. Second, because I believe that transparency is the best ideology for managing complex systems. For example, in software development, open source has also led to robust code (security), highly skilled developer communities (education), and non-monopolistic pricing (fair economies). If transferable to biological engineering, open source could lead to a more diversified, and more sustainable, biotechnology industry. These ideas are explored in Open Sources 2.0, which is published by O'Reilly and is, ironically, not open source. I'll send you a PDF if you ask for one.


Background

In 1995, I was hired away from a PhD in genomics by Amgen, Inc. to provide bioinformatics support for the newly formed Amgen Institute, a 120 person research facility located in Toronto, Canada. There, I facilitated dozens of advanced research projects involving microarrays, genetic sequence analysis, and data mining, and also discovered a knack for strategy and project management. (Today, the institute is unaffiliated with Amgen and known as the Campbell Family Cancer Research Institute.) In 2002, I co-founded of Miikana Therapeutics, a drug development company. I resigned after the company operations were stable to explore my synthetic biology interests. In December, 2005, Miikana was sold to Entremed for $21 million plus milestones.

Since 2003, I have focused my attention on open source synthetic biology. As part of my broad education and outreach agenda, I am founding an open source biotechnology company that will make breakthrough, personalized cancer therapeutics and give them away for free. The development process has been slower than expected, but steady. I am based in Alberta, Canada, which is an ideal test bed for new technologies, but travel widely.

My professional role models are the fictional Nick Haflinger and, more recently, Manfred Macx, a venture altruist:

"Manfred is at the peak of his profession, which is essentially coming up with whacky but workable ideas and giving them to people who will make fortunes with them. He does this for free, gratis. In return, he has virtual immunity from the tyranny of cash; money is a symptom of poverty, after all, and Manfred never has to pay for anything." -- Accelerando, by Charles Stross (2005)

My work has been supported by the University of Oklahoma, the University of Toronto, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the Alberta Ingenuity Fund, among others.


Contact Information

hi-res photo
email: ahessel (at) gmail (dot) com
phone: 780.868.3169
Skype: search for "Andrew Hessel", ahessel (at) gmail (dot) com

Don't be shy about contacting me -- I'm open. I prefer email.

Letter post:

Andrew Hessel
c/o Alberta Ingenuity Fund
Suite 2410, Manulife Place
10180 - 101 Street
Edmonton, Alberta
Canada T5J 3S4

2008

Science Cafe, Telus World of Science and Alberta Ingenuity, Edmonton, May 6, 2008

Sanofi Aventis BioTalent Challenge Keynote, Calgary, April 23, 2008

Sanofi Aventis BioTalent Challenge Keynote, Edmonton, April 16, 2008

Civil Society Synthetic Biology Teach-In, Washington DC, April 14, 2008 PDF

TEC Edmonton, Open Source Therapeutics, round 2, March 31, 2008

TEC Edmonton, Open Source Therapeutics, March 19, 2008

Overview of iGEM program, Edmonton Catholic School Board, March 18, 2008

Open Source Therapeutics. UofA Digital Biology Meeting, March 17, 2008

National Post Article on SciBarCamp by David Sachs.

Synbio Debate w/ Jim Thomas, ETC group; open source therapeutics scibarcamp, Toronto, May 14-16, 2008

Synthetic Biology and Nanotechnology: Opportunities and Implications for Alberta, Green Paper and Talk, Banff, March 5-6, 2008

Southern Alberta Institute of Technology (SAIT), Overview of Synthetic Biology, February 2008.

2007 Talks and Posters

iGEM and Synthetic Biology: Opportunities for Canada, University of Ottawa, November 23, 2007 audio by request

SemBioSys Biotechnologies, Calgary, Alberta, October 26, 2007

Synthetic Biology, Risks, Rewards, and Opportunities, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, October 23 audio by request

Synthetic Viruses Targeting Cancer, SENS 3, Cambridge UK, September 7Video

Overview of synthetic biology, University of Lethbridge, July 19

University of Alberta Department Chairs and Divisional Directors Meeting, July 4

SB3.0 Poster -- iGEM: A case study for open source biological engineering

MIT TTT Canada overview May 26 Video

Digital Genetic Engineering, Google, May 3 Video

Alberta Ingenuity, January 17/18

Photos and Videos