ACL Reconstruction, by Anthony Valle and Roger D. Morin

From OpenWetWare

Revision as of 16:35, 11 February 2013 by Anthony V. Valle (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL reconstruction) is the process by which a tissue graft is inserted into the place of the anterior cruciate ligament in order to replace the functionality of the torn ligament. The ACL injury is one of the most common knee injuries with around 95,000 tears a year. Of those 95,000 there are about 60,000-75,000 reconstructions performed annually in the United States [1]. The ACL, which is located in the middle of the knee, helps to connect the tibia (shin) to the femur (thigh). The functionality of the ACL is to keep the tibia from sliding in front of the femur, as well as giving rotational stability to the knee [2]. The other crucial ligaments located in the knee joint consist of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), and medial collateral ligament (MCL). Although the most common cause of an ACL tear is athletics, 70% of the injuries occur through non-contact mechanisms such as decelerated running, jumping, or cutting. The remaining 30% of the injuries occur as a result of contact with another object [2]. The procedure to reconstruct the ligament is done through arthroscopic knee surgery. An endoscope, or small camera, is inserted into the patient’s knee through a small incision, and the doctor performs the surgery through the image that is projected.

History

1895 – A.W. Mayo Robson (UK) performs the first cruciate ligament repair on a 41-year-old patient. The torn ligament was stitched into position at the femur. [3]

1903 – F.Lange (Ger.) performs first ACL replacement using braided silk as a graft. The procedure was unsuccessful. [3]

1917 – Ernest W. Hey Groves (Ger.) performs first successful ACL replacement by connecting iliotibial band was connected from the femur to a hole placed in the joint. [3]

1918 – Inside of the knee is first seen by use of cytoscope by Kenji Takagi [4]

1921 – Dr. Eugene Bircher become first doctor to perform arthroscopy of the knee on a live patient. [4]

1935 – Willis Campbell (US) performs first ACL reconstruction with tendon, using the patellar tendon located in the tibia. [3]

1969 – Kurt Franke (Ger.) uses a bone-tendon-bone graft to reconstruct the torn anterior cruciate ligament. [3]

1981 – D.J. Dandy first implanted a carbon-fiber reinforced substitute for ACL with an arthroscopic procedure [8]

1988 – First hamstring autograft is used for reconstruction by M. J. Friedman [3].

Procedures

Today there are two methods in practice of ACL reconstruction: Autografts, and Allografts. Autografts utilize replacement ligaments from the patient’s body, while allografts utilize replacement ligaments from a donor’s body. Of the two types of reconstruction, autograft reconstruction is most common in today’s practice. Typically autograft reconstruction uses either the patellar or hamstring tendons, while allograft reconstruction uses a donor’s Achilles or quadriceps tendon. In both cases, the torn ligament is removed, and the chosen graft is surgically inserted in its place.

Patellar Tendon Autografts

The most common type of reconstructive surgery uses the patellar tendon as a tissue graft. The patellar tendon, located at the front of the knee, connects the patella (knee cap) to the tibia (shin). In order to harvest the graft, a 3-4” incision is made along the front of the tendon, and the middle third is removed (10-11 mm), with 2 cm of bone blocks at each end. One bone block is harvested from the tibia tubercle, while the other is obtained from the patella, and the bone at each end of the graft is screwed into the tibia and femur respectively. This autograft is considered to be more stably anchored because of the bone-bone interface, which is more sturdy, and heals quicker than a tissue-bone interface would. [2][5] This method of ACL reconstruction is proven to be reliable, as the rate of failure of the patellar tendon autograft is only about 5%. Additionally, studies have also shown that the patellar tendon occasionally will regenerate, or grow back after part of it is removed. [2][6] While this choice of tissue graft may seem to be ideal because of the, it does come with complications. This procedure is more invasive than some of the other graft options, because it requires a second incision that needs to be made along the front of the patella. Furthermore, many patients experienced an increase in pain behind the kneecap especially when kneeling, as well of an increased risk of tendonitis in the patellar tendon.

Hamstring Tendon Autografts

Although there are several variations of hamstring tendon grafts, the most common are performed by using the semitendinosous hamstring and gracilis tendons, located on the inside of the knee. In order to reconstruct the torn ACL, this tendon is screwed into the femur and tibia at their respective ends. The advantage to using the hamstring autograft, is that it is a lot less invasive than that of the patellar tendon autograft. This is because when most of the time the hamstring can be harvested using a small incision in comparison to the larger incision above the patella. However, this tissue-to-bone interface is less sturdy than that of a bone-to-bone interface used in the patellar tendon graft. [2][5] This method of reconstruction has begun to rise in the past decade due to the increased research in the graft fixation techniques. Recently new screws have been developed with specific threads that do not cut the hamstring tendon. This allows for the tendon to be screwed in and fixed within the bone tunnel. [5]

Quadriceps Tendon Autografts

The quadriceps tendon is, more likely than not, used for ACL revision surgery. The quadriceps autograft is a hybrid-like variation of the hamstring and patellar tendons. The harvesting of the tendon is performed by making a horizontal incision just above the knee cap. Much like the patellar tendon autograft, the quadriceps autograft is harvested with a bone plug from the patella, which makes it easy to fixate in place of the ACL. Typically, 5 cm of the quad tendon is removed, and the 2 cm of the bone plug is fixed into the femur with a screw. However, at the opposite end of the tendon, no bone plug is harvested, and so the tendon needs to be fixated to the tibia similarly to the hamstring tendon. Even though the harvesting of the graft requires a piece of the patella to be removed, the harvesting of the bone is performed at the upper pole of the patella, making it possible to obtain a graft even if a patellar tendon autograft was previously performed.[2][5][7]

Much like the patellar tendon autograft, occasionally the quadriceps donor site will regenerate the harvested tendon. Also similar to the patellar tendon autograft, the use of a quad tendon autograft may increase pain behind the patella, since the graft requires a piece of the bone to be removed. [2][5][7]

Allografts

An advantage of choosing to use an allograft, is that there will be no pain or scaring from a donor site, since the graft will be chosen from a foreign source, most likely a cadaver. Again, since the patient is not contributing the donor site, this procedure is the least painful. The most common types of allografts used include the hamstring, patellar, and Achilles tendons. These tendon reconstructions are performed identical to that of the autografts. Allografts are typically used as a method for ACL reconstruction revision, where the previous reconstruction has failed. The autograft is considered to be more desirable during the first reconstruction, because doctors hesitate to introduce a foreign source into the body in order to avoid a higher risk of infection, or viral transmission (HIV, AIDS, etc). Allografts also tend to have a higher graft failure rate, which ranges from 23%-35%. Allografts may also be used when there is a need for simultaneous reconstructions of ligaments, because of the possible lack of sufficient donor sites. [2][5][8]

Synthetic Grafts

The most desirable type of graft used for ACL reconstruction would be to use a synthetic graft. A synthetic graft would remove the requirement of using a patient’s donor site when using an autograft, as well as remove the possibility of viral transmission which is the concern with allograft use. The initial synthetic ACL grafts were made out of carbon fibers, with the first synthetic ACL reconstruction procedure occurring in 1981. However, this proved to be unsuccessful. In 1986, a new synthetic material was made out of polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE), which was a material already being used in vascular surgery. A single strand of this material was wounded into multiple loops, and became to be known as the “Gore-Tex ligament.” Although the FDA approved the use of the synthetic ligament, it was only approved as a means of revision surgery. While some studies supported the use of the Gore-Tex graft, the mechanical properties of the graft were soon found to be unsuitable, where there was no tissue ingrowth, and a presence of wear debris. The Gore-Tex graft was withdrawn from the market in 1993, and the use of the material had been abandoned in ACL reconstruction surgery. [5][9] There have also been a number of other synthetic graft types which include: polyester, polypropylene, and polyethylene terephtalate. This polyethylene terephtalate graft, known as Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS), is the forefront of new developmental synthetic grafts. These ligaments are made so that structure allows tissue ingrowth in the intra-articular part, thereby helping the healing process and creating a stronger and more reliable synthetic graft. [9]

Future of ACL Reconstruction

The future of ACL reconstruction lies in the development of a reliable synthetic graft. The LARS ligament is on the right path, however, in order to succeed, tissue engineering should provide a functional and biologically valid ACL, able to promote a continuous tissue remodeling. [9]

Another important development deals with the fixation of the grafts. One of the issues that lies in using a hamstring graft, is that the screw used to keep the tendon in place, many times ends up actually harming the structural integrity of the tendon. A new development in “interface screws” threads, have been made so that the tendon does not get damaged by the screw. Another development in screw technologies, includes bioresorbable screws, which will absorb into the body after 2-3 years. This same technology can also come impregnated with hydroxyapetite, a bone growth stimulant, which will encourage bone growth into the graft placement. [5]

Further research also lies in the development of an extracellular matrix (ECM) based scaffold that is implanted with autologous platelets. Studies have found that this extracellular matrix–based scaffold combined with autologous platelets stimulated functional healing of the ACL. With continual engineering and research, ACL reconstruction may be accomplished without the need of a graft. [10]

References

[1] Gammons, M. “Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.” Medscape, May 2012. Web. Feb 2013. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23102671>

[2] “ACL Injury: Does It Require Surgery”. <http://orthoinfo.aaos.org/topic.cfm?topic=a00297> Accessed Feb. 2013.

[3] Colombet, P. et al. “The History of ACL Surgery”. Bordeaux-Mérignac Centre of Orthopaedic and Sports Surgery. Web. Accessed Feb. 2013. <http://www.maitrise-orthop.com/corpusmaitri/orthopaedic/87_colombet/colombetus.shtml>

[4] Busch, S. “History of ACL Surgery” EHow. Web. Accessed Feb. 2013 <http://www.ehow.com/about_5269773_history-acl-surgery.html>

[5] Centers for Orthopedics. Web. Accessed Feb. 2013. <http://www.ehow.com/about_5269773_history-acl-surgery.html>

[6] Eriksson, K et al. “Semitendonous Tendon Regeneration After Reconstruction. A Prospective MRI Study.” Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2001;9(1):54-5.

[7] Akoto, R; Hoeher, J. “Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction With Quadriceps Tendon Autograft and Press-Fit Fixation Using an Anteromedial Portal Technique.” Akoto and Hoeher BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2012, 13:161.

[8] Ellis HB, et al. “Outcomes and Revision Rate After Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Allograft Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Aged 18 years or Younger with Closed Physes.” Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2012 Dec;28(12):1819-25.

[9] Legnani, C et al. “Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Synthetic Grafts. A Review of Literature.” International Orthopaedics (SICOT) (2010) 34:465–471.

[10] American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. “Award-Winning Research May Make ACL Healing Without Reconstruction Possible” Web. Accessed Feb. 2013. <http://www.aaos.org/news/aaosnow/feb13/research7.asp>

Personal tools