20.20/Biocomputing: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 6: Line 6:
* Research RNA folding / 2,3-ary structure
* Research RNA folding / 2,3-ary structure
* Research tRNAs (see links below for starters)
* Research tRNAs (see links below for starters)
* The [[http://openwetware.org/wiki/20.020:_Technical_Specification_Review|Tech Spec Review]] is on Wednesday, 9 April (4 weeks after 3 Ideas).
* The [[20.020: Technical Specification Review|Tech Spec Review]] is on Wednesday, 9 April (4 weeks after 3 Ideas).


==Team Members==
==Team Members==

Revision as of 20:02, 12 March 2008

Vision

To develop novel models of computation appropriate to the biological world.

Action Items

  • Hit up Sussman and Knight again -- in particular, clarify exactly why Sussman thought the ribozyme idea was such a useful important thing to do.
  • Research RNA folding / 2,3-ary structure
  • Research tRNAs (see links below for starters)
  • The Tech Spec Review is on Wednesday, 9 April (4 weeks after 3 Ideas).

Team Members

20.20 Students

  • Kelly Drinkwater (Foo)
  • Raphael Rush (Bar)
  • Star Simpson (Baz)

20.902 Students

  • Kay Aull
  • Stephanie Nix

Brainstorming

Main brainstorms page

  • Biological neural nets
  • DNA-encoded Turing machine
  • Adder circuit
  • PCR readout for genetic switches
  • Addressable DNA modification based on RNA input
  • Fix scaling issues
  • RNA binding screens
  • Circuit elements of protein cascades
  • Ontology for standard biological parts

3 Ideas Presentation

...was a great success. See contents on the brainstorming page.

  • Idea 1: Intercellular communication (Game of Life)
  • Idea 2: DNA Turing Machine
  • Idea 3: Signaling (Ribozymes)

Here is the feedback we received from the class poll at the end:

  • Which idea addresses the most important challenge or opportunity? #3 52%, #2 33%, #1 15%
  • Which idea would have the greatest impact if fully successful? #3 61%, #2 29%, #1 11%
  • Which idea is most competitive with alternative technologies? #3 59%, #2 30%, #1 11%
  • Which idea has the greatest certainty and fewest unknowables? #3 48%, #1 28%, #2 24%

The class seems to agree with us that the ribozyme idea is pretty cool and actually viable as a project.

Directory of Interesting Things

Literature and Similar

tRNA on the RCSB Protein Data Bank.

Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases on the RCSB Protein Data Bank.

tRNA, the Adaptor Hypothesis and the Wobble Hypothesis: lots of good information about tRNA. Nonstandard bases / base pairings; lack of neurotic specificity in the last base of the anticodon; genes coding for tRNAs in E. coli; the works. As well as some good textbook references.

A DNA and Restriction Enzyme Implementation of Turing Machines

A Dicer-like protein in Tetrahymena has distinct functions in genome rearrangement, chromosome segregation, and meiotic prophase

The Neurally Controlled Animat: Biological Brains Acting with Simulated Bodies

Computing with DNA. Shortish review in Nature by Jack Parker, describing Adleman's traveling-salesman solver and Shapiro's Turing-machine-oid.

People

Ron Weiss's web page. He also wrote a really interesting review paper a few years back on the subject. I can't remember where it is...

Christina Smolke's web page. Seems to be doing interesting RNA things potentially related to our ribozyme idea.

Amorphous Computing Home Page.

Jake Beal's web page.