20.109(F14): Mod 1 Day 4 DNA ligations, bacterial transformations and CometChip

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Part 3: Make your own CometChip)
(High Throughput DNA Damage Assay -- The CometChip)
Line 23: Line 23:
[[Image:Fig2_Wood_et_al_PNAS_F14_20109.tif|thumb|right|300px|'''Figure 1''': Single cell gel electrophesis (comet assay) after exposure of cells to radiation. The ''head'' of the comet contains the undamaged DNA which does not migrate on the gel due to tight winding of the DNA. The ''tail'' of the comet contains the damaged DNA. DNA damage can be quantified by calculating the percentage of total DNA within the tail. The plot shows the amount of SybrGold-stained DNA as a function of comet length.]]
[[Image:Fig2_Wood_et_al_PNAS_F14_20109.tif|thumb|right|300px|'''Figure 1''': Single cell gel electrophesis (comet assay) after exposure of cells to radiation. The ''head'' of the comet contains the undamaged DNA which does not migrate on the gel due to tight winding of the DNA. The ''tail'' of the comet contains the damaged DNA. DNA damage can be quantified by calculating the percentage of total DNA within the tail. The plot shows the amount of SybrGold-stained DNA as a function of comet length.]]
-
The traditional comet assay, first described in [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0006291X8490411X 1984], involves mixing live cells with low temperature agarose (this means it melts around 37C) and casting a small gel on a microscope slide. Cells were exposed to DNA damaging agents either before or after being mixed with the agarose. Following cell lysis in an alkaline (pH 9.5) buffer to unwind the DNA superstructure, the slides are placed in a gel box -- just like the ones we have in the lab -- and electrophoresed for a short time. The damaged DNA <font color=red>&ndash; and only the damaged DNA &ndash; (I suggest that the text, like the figure, reinforce this point)</font color> will travel away from the nucleus and form a structure that looks just like a comet tail (Figure 1).
+
The traditional comet assay, first described in [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0006291X8490411X 1984], involves mixing live cells with low temperature agarose (this means it melts around 37 &deg;C) and casting a small gel on a microscope slide. Cells were exposed to DNA damaging agents either before or after being mixed with the agarose. Following cell lysis in an alkaline (pH 9.5) buffer to unwind the DNA superstructure, the slides are placed in a gel box -- just like the ones we have in the lab -- and electrophoresed for a short time. The damaged DNA <font color=red>&ndash; and only the damaged DNA &ndash; (I suggest that the text, like the figure, reinforce this point)</font color> will travel away from the nucleus and form a structure that looks just like a comet tail (Figure 1).
The comet assay is very sensitive and, because you measure damage in each cell individually, allows for collection of DNA damage data from many different experimental conditions. However, because the cells are mixed into the agarose, there is significant variability <font color=red>is this the right word? still seems like an image/analysis-''confounding'' issue</font color>due to cell density (comet tails that run into each other) and difficulty with imaging (the cells might be in different z-planes of the gel). Furthermore, quantification of the main comet assay parameters, as shown in Figure 1, is tedious when performed one comet at a time.
The comet assay is very sensitive and, because you measure damage in each cell individually, allows for collection of DNA damage data from many different experimental conditions. However, because the cells are mixed into the agarose, there is significant variability <font color=red>is this the right word? still seems like an image/analysis-''confounding'' issue</font color>due to cell density (comet tails that run into each other) and difficulty with imaging (the cells might be in different z-planes of the gel). Furthermore, quantification of the main comet assay parameters, as shown in Figure 1, is tedious when performed one comet at a time.

Revision as of 10:35, 8 August 2014

20.109(F14): Laboratory Fundamentals of Biological Engineering

Home        People        Schedule Fall 2014        Assignments        Lab Basics        OWW Basics       
DNA Engineering        System Engineering        Biomaterials Engineering              

Contents

DNA ligations and bacterial transformations

Introduction

Ligation and Transformation

Today you will ligate your linearized plasmid backbone with your PCR product by mixing the two in the presence of ATP and an enzyme, T4 DNA ligase. During the ligation reactions, hydrogen bonds will form between the overhangs on the fragments, and then the ligase will repair the phosphate backbone, creating a stable circular plasmid (as shown in the figure below).

DNA ligation
DNA ligation
Bacterial transformation
Bacterial transformation

If all goes well, your ligation reactions will generate your desired construct: the pCX-NXX backbone carrying the EGFP gene lacking the first 32 amino acids. You will transform this product into bacteria. During “transformation,” a single plasmid from the ligation mixture enters a single bacterium and, once inside, replicates and expresses the genes it encodes. One of the genes on the pCX-NNX plasmid leads to ampicillin-resistance. Thus, a transformed bacterium will grow on agar medium containing ampicillin. Untransformed cells will die before they can form a colony on the agar surface.

Most bacteria do not usually exist in a “transformation ready” state, but the bacteria can be made permeable to the plasmid DNA, and cells that are capable of transformation are referred to as “competent.” Competent cells are extremely fragile and should be handled gently, specifically kept cold and not vortexed. The transformation procedure is efficient enough for most lab purposes, with efficiencies as high as 109 transformed cells per microgram of DNA, but it is important to realize that even with high efficiency cells only 1 DNA molecule in about 10,000 is successfully transformed.

High Throughput DNA Damage Assay -- The CometChip

Thus far, you have been constructing a molecular sensor to quantify the ability of cells to repair double stranded DNA breaks using homologous recombination. In fact, with your truncated GFP plasmid system you can only 'see' the repair of DNA through the recovery of green fluorescence. But, what if you wanted to see DNA damage instead of repair? There is an app for that -- well, not quite the app you were thinking, but there is a Matlab GUI for that -- and you'll get to use it on M1D6.

One common way to quantify DNA damage employs a technique that you've already completed in 20.109 -- DNA electrophoresis. Single cell gel electrophoresis, better known as the comet assay, allows us to take advantage of the fact that DNA migration during electrophoresis varies based upon its structure (think about how cut versus uncut plasmids look on a gel). Therefore, if we damage a piece of (or many, many pieces) of either cut first "of" or move second into parentheses DNA through introduction of single and double stranded breaks, we can differentiate the damaged DNA versus intact DNA using a fluorescent DNA stain. In fact, we can quantify DNA damage in a single cell!

Figure 1: Single cell gel electrophesis (comet assay) after exposure of cells to radiation. The head of the comet contains the undamaged DNA which does not migrate on the gel due to tight winding of the DNA. The tail of the comet contains the damaged DNA. DNA damage can be quantified by calculating the percentage of total DNA within the tail. The plot shows the amount of SybrGold-stained DNA as a function of comet length.
Figure 1: Single cell gel electrophesis (comet assay) after exposure of cells to radiation. The head of the comet contains the undamaged DNA which does not migrate on the gel due to tight winding of the DNA. The tail of the comet contains the damaged DNA. DNA damage can be quantified by calculating the percentage of total DNA within the tail. The plot shows the amount of SybrGold-stained DNA as a function of comet length.

The traditional comet assay, first described in 1984, involves mixing live cells with low temperature agarose (this means it melts around 37 °C) and casting a small gel on a microscope slide. Cells were exposed to DNA damaging agents either before or after being mixed with the agarose. Following cell lysis in an alkaline (pH 9.5) buffer to unwind the DNA superstructure, the slides are placed in a gel box -- just like the ones we have in the lab -- and electrophoresed for a short time. The damaged DNA – and only the damaged DNA – (I suggest that the text, like the figure, reinforce this point) will travel away from the nucleus and form a structure that looks just like a comet tail (Figure 1).

The comet assay is very sensitive and, because you measure damage in each cell individually, allows for collection of DNA damage data from many different experimental conditions. However, because the cells are mixed into the agarose, there is significant variability is this the right word? still seems like an image/analysis-confounding issuedue to cell density (comet tails that run into each other) and difficulty with imaging (the cells might be in different z-planes of the gel). Furthermore, quantification of the main comet assay parameters, as shown in Figure 1, is tedious when performed one comet at a time.

A collaboration between the Engelward and Bhatia labs here at MIT solved these problems with the CometChip! link to labs or maybe an MIT news article if there is one? The CometChip is made using a microfabricated polymer mask that creates tiny microwells 50 um deep and 30 um apart in a 1% agarose gel. Once the wells are formed, cells are loaded onto the gel and 1-2 cells settle into each well. When the excess cells are removed, a consistent cell pattern remains. We'll talk more about how to load the CometChip gel next time and how to use the Matlab GUI to analyze CometChip data on M1D6, but today you will fabricate your own CometChip to laterquantify DNA damage in single cells due to exposure to varying doses of irradiation. Additionally, you will be tricky and also quantify the extent of DNA repair 30 min post-irradiation. Think about how thatmaybe change "that" to "the repair experiment" or repair "condition"? might be done over the course of the next couple days.

Protocol

Part 1: Ligation Reactions

For your ligation, you should use around 50-100 ng of the prepared backbone and a 1:4 molar ratio of backbone to insert. The volumes needed for these amounts can be estimated by comparison to the DNA ladder, as you saw in your homework. You will also set-up two control ligations. The “bkb+insert, no ligase” reaction controls for any errant uncut plasmid that might have wandered into your solutions. The “bkb only, plus ligase” reaction controls for religation of the backbone, from any singly cut plasmids for example.

The contents of each ligation will be

bkb + insert,
no ligase
bkb only,
plus ligase
bkb + insert,
plus ligase
pCX-NNX bkb  ? μl  ? μl  ? μl
PCR insert  ? μl xxx  ? μl
10X Ligation Buffer^ 1.5 μl 1.5 μl 1.5 μl
T4 DNA Ligase xxx 0.5 μl 0.5 μl
Water To 15 μl not including volume of enzyme

^New England Biolabs sells 10X Ligation buffer to use with their ligase. It contains ATP so must be kept on ice.

  1. Assemble the reactions in eppendorf tubes but *NOT* in the order listed. Please ask one of the teaching faculty if you are unsure in what order to assemble the components.
  2. When the ligation mixtures are complete, flick the tubes to mix the contents, quick spin them in the microfuge to bring down any droplets, and then incubate the reactions at room temperature for at least 10 minutes.

Part 2: Precipitation of DNA

In this step, salts and buffers are removed from the reactions. DNA is precipitated with salt and ethanol. Yeast tRNA is added to the precipitation as “carrier,” allowing you to better visualize the DNA pellets and also likely stabilizing the DNA to improve transformation as described in this paper. The salts are washed from the pellets with 70% ethanol. The tRNA is not removed. Rather, it enters the bacteria with the ligation DNA, but is then rapidly degraded.

  1. Add 20 μl 3M sodium acetate to each tube.
  2. Add 5 μl tRNA to each tube.
  3. Add 200 μl 100% cold ethanol to each tube and vortex.
  4. Spin in a room temperature microfuge 15 minutes. Be sure to orient your tubes in the microfuge so you know where your pellets should be.
    • You can balance your tubes with those of another group, with a water-filled eppendorf tube, or using three-way symmetry (e.g., slots 1, 9, and 17).
  5. When the spin is done, locate the pellets in each of the eppendorf tubes. They may appear as solid white dots at the bottom corner of the tube or they may appear to be a diffuse white smear along the wall of the tube. Both are OK. Carefully remove the ethanol from the pellets with your P1000, taking care not to disturb the pellet. You do not have to remove every last drop.
  6. Wash the pellets with 500 μl 70% cold ethanol. This procedure is done by dribbling the 70% ethanol along the wall of the eppendorf tube that is opposite your pellet and then removing the 70% ethanol with the same pipet tip. Again you should not disturb the pellet and you do not have to remove every drop of liquid in the tube. If the pellet seems to float away from the wall of the tube, you can re-spin the tubes for 2 minutes with the liquid to adhere the pellets to the wall again.
  7. Once you have washed all your pellets, give the tubes a quick spin in the microfuge to bring down any droplets of ethanol that cling to the sides of the tube then remove any remaining liquid from the tubes using your P200. Allow your tubes to dry in the hood. All the ethanol must be removed or evaporated.

Part 3: Make your own CometChip

While your samples are drying, you and your partner will have the chance to produce your own high throughput screening platform for DNA damage. Two teams will prepare the gels at a time to prevent any molten agarose run-ins. Before you do this protocol, make sure to watch the additional pre-lab video for some hints. If you are waiting for your turn, skip to [xxx Part 5] to complete a problem that will save you precious time during the next lab session.

Pick up the following supplies from the front bench:

  • Plastic tray for pouring your gel
  • One piece of GelBond
  • One 100 mL erlenmeyer flask


Fabricating your CometChip:

  1. Add 0.4 g of agarose to your flask using the scale on the back bench.
  2. Add 40 mL of PBS to flask and bring to the electrophoresis bench along with your GelBond and plastic tray.
  3. Before melting your agarose, set-up a space on the electrophoresis bench for your plastic tray. Dribble a couple drops of water on the GelBond film to confirm which side is the hydrophobic side -- the hydrophobic side should face down when preparing the gel.
  4. A member of the teaching staff will microwave your agarose until it is completely melted and show you how to safely handle the hot flask (but you should also wear your safety glasses!).
  5. Add a small amount (3-4 mL) of gel in the bottom of your plastic tray.
  6. Immediately put the GelBond onto top of the agarose (hydrophobic side down!) and smooth out any air bubbles. It is useful to push the GelBond all the way to one side of the plastic tray, leaving a little room on the other side without any film.
  7. After 5 min, remove any agarose that has solidified on top of the GelBond. Make sure to remove all of it.
  8. Return to the microwave and have the teaching staff re-heat your agarose.
  9. Pipette 15 mL of agarose on top of the GelBond.
  10. Immediately use the PDMS stamp to form the microwells. Do this by placing the stamp on one side of your plastic tray and then slowly lower it into the gel without introducing bubbles. Remember, don't lift the stamp up if you think you have a bubble, just continue to lower it at a slow pace.
  11. Wait for 10 min for the gel to solidify and then add 5 mL of PBS to the plastic tray.
  12. Slowly peel the stamp away from the gel.
  13. Carry your gel to the dissection microscope that you used during the lab tour, and examine your wells. You can take a picture if you'd like.
  14. Remove all excess agarose from your plastic tray, replace your gel, and then cover with PBS. We will store your gel for you at 4 °C until next time.

Part 4: Bacterial Transformations

You will perform 4 bacterial transformations, one for each of the ligation mixtures as well as one transformation with 5 ng of plasmid DNA to assess transformation frequency.

Tube Transformation Add
1 positive control plasmid 1 μl (5 ng) of pCX-EGFP
2 bkb + insert, no ligase 5 μl
3 bkb only, plus ligase 5 μl
4 bkb+insert, plus ligase 5 μl
  1. Resuspend the precipitated pellets from Part 2 in 15 μl sterile water by adding water to the tubes and mixing. If the DNA does not readily go into solution, it helps to heat the DNA in the 42°C heat block, then vortex and pipet up and down several times. Bring any droplets down to the bottom of the tubes with a quick spin in the microfuge.
  2. Prewarm and dry five LB+AMP plates by placing them in the 37°C incubator, media side up with the lids ajar.
  3. Get an aliquot of competent cells from one of the teaching faculty. Keep these cells on ice at all times. There should be at least 200 μl of cells in each tube. Aliquot 50 μl of cells into 4 clean eppendorf tubes.
  4. Add DNA to each tube of cells as shown in the table below.
  5. Flick to mix the contents and leave the tubes on ice for at least 2 minutes.
  6. Heat shock the cells at 42°C for 90 seconds exactly (use your timer) and then put on ice for two minutes.
  7. Move the samples to a rack on your bench and use your P1000 to add 0.5 ml of LB media to each eppendorf tube. Invert each tube to mix.
  8. Plate 200 μl of each transformation mix on LB+AMP plates, plating the bkb+insert+ligase transformation twice. Note: After dipping the glass spreader in the ethanol jar, pass it through the flame of the alcohol burner just long enough to ignite the ethanol. After letting the ethanol burn off, the spreader may still be very hot, and it is advisable to tap it gently on a portion of the agar plate without cells in order to equilibrate it with the agar (if it sizzles, it's way too hot). Once the plates are done, wrap them together with one piece of colored tape and incubate them in the 37°C incubator overnight. One of the teaching faculty will remove them from the incubator and set up liquid cultures for you to use next time.

Part 5: Diagnostic Digest Calculations

Next time you will isolate DNA from four transformants and begin to characterize the plasmids in these bacteria. Using the plasmid map you created after Module 1 Day 2 and the guidelines below, plan a diagnostic restriction digest that will confirm the presence of the PCR insert. Please clearly show all your work and reasoning in your lab notebook, and be sure that your plan explicitly includes

  • the enzyme names
  • the buffer and temperature conditions for the reaction
  • the expected band sizes for a plasmid without insert, versus the expected sizes for a plasmid with insert
  • the volumes of enzyme and buffer that should be used per one 25 μL reaction containing 2.5 U of each enzyme
  • the NEB website is your friend here! mouse over tools and resources to see "popular tools"
  • see also "References" on the Module 1 home page.
  • you can also refer to the Day 5 protocol for a sample enzyme calculation

Diagnostic digest guidelines

When choosing enzymes for diagnostic digests, it is good practice to choose two enzymes that, together

  • uniquely cut both the plasmid backbone and the insert
  • verify a newly introduced restriction site on the insert
  • work best in the same buffer and at the same temperature
  • release fragments that can be visualized and distinguished on a gel.
    • fragments smaller than 200 base-pairs may be very faint
    • fragments larger than 3 kilobases are difficult to precisely size
    • fragments closer together than a few hundred base-pairs may be difficult to distinguish

In an ideal world, you would run two diagnostic digests to validate your new construct, but please plan only one for the purposes of this module.

For next week (Due M1D6)

  1. Imagine that your EGFP positive control turns up 200 colonies. What is the transformation efficiency under these conditions, in colony-forming units (CFU) per μg of DNA? Be sure to carefully consider how much DNA ended up on the plate.
  2. If you found an equal number of colonies on your "bkb+ligase" plate and your "bkb+ins+ligase" plate, what DNA would you predominantly expect to isolate from the "bkb+ins+ligase" colonies, plasmid with insert or plasmid without insert? In 2-3 sentences, explain how plasmid without insert could end up being recovered here -- which experimental step(s) failed, and how?
  3. Revise your earlier draft of the Methods section, just through M1D2, applying the feedback you received.
  4. Prepare the rest of your Methods section (through M1D5) in outline form. Start by considering what methods may be logically grouped together. At a minimum, you should turn in
    • sub-section titles
    • topic sentences for each sub-section
    • if necessary, a few short phrases indicating what content will be included in that sub-section
  5. Prepare a schematic diagram that describes your study of homologous recombination -- the diagram should include information about the construction of your plasmid system and (at this point) a rough idea of how you will use the system to study DNA damage. See the schematic overview on the Module 1 homepage, but make sure that your diagram is presents your own thoughts and ideas (i.e. do not just copy that diagram!). Note: schematic diagrams require figure captions.
  6. Read the 1998 paper from Takeda lab, along with the guiding questions for our upcoming discussion here. UPDATE: Please just read the text through that associated with Figure 3 (about 3.5 pgs).

Note: Questions 1 and 2 are not to be turned in but they should help prepare you to interpret the results you will collect and to analyze and frame your data for the Data Summary assignment. Questions 3 - 5 should be submitted on M1D6.

Reagents list

ligation and precipitation

  • T4 DNA Ligase Buffer (1X)
    • from NEB
    • 50 mM Tris-HCl
    • 10 mM MgCl2
    • 10 mM DTT
    • 1 mM ATP
    • 25 μg/ml BSA
  • yeast tRNA
    • from Life Technologies
    • stock concentration is 12.5 mg/mL

transformation

  • pCX-EGFP at 5 ng/μL
  • Luria-Bertani (LB) broth
    • 1% Tryptone
    • 0.5% Yeast Extract
    • 1% NaCl
  • LB+AMP plates
    • LB with 2% agar and 100 μg/ml ampicillin
  • XL-1 Blue e.coli (Agilent)
Personal tools