User:Alexander L. Davis/Notebook/In the Problem Pit/2013/03/14: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
* Believed others would not enroll for the same reasons: invasiveness, too little compensation, and that it "might be difficult to remember what to do and when." | * Believed others would not enroll for the same reasons: invasiveness, too little compensation, and that it "might be difficult to remember what to do and when." | ||
* Others would enroll if they didn't care about the invasiveness. | * Others would enroll if they didn't care about the invasiveness. | ||
* The most important thing that needs to be explained is how the frame will track usage (this needs to be corrected; the smart-meter tracks the usage, so they need to know it's already being tracked, they are just now able to see it). | |||
* Make the expectations of them clear (what is expected of me?). | |||
* Have an image of the frame rather than a link. | |||
* Explain why we want this info, how will it be used. | |||
==Faults== | ==Faults== |
Revision as of 09:58, 15 March 2013
Project name | <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html> |
Entry titleFirst Pass CommentsThese are the first two pretests. I have a vague concern about the research, not knowing exactly what the focus or story is. I am considering xx. Created a qualification in MTurk for one participant to allow him to be in future problem pit studies. I need to create an acceptance sampling method to keep the number of pre-test participants bounded.
Unexpected Observations
New Hypotheses
Current Protocol
Current MaterialsNew Data
Participant 1
Participant 2
Faults
Corrections
|