Holcombe:TemporalLimitsReview

Notes for the project described in Holcombe2009TICS as well as forthcoming _Subjective Time_ MIT Press volumes

old notes for Dani JoV paper: Temporal Noise

ModellingUncertainty

also see multiple drafts of consciousness vs. postdiction

integration interval
Melcher-etal-2004 found attention / central viewing dramatically increased motion integration interval, with max integration interval 10 sec as found by Burr and Santoro

effect of distance on temporal binding (in cases where low-level motion was avoided)
More discussion at my Google Doc on the topic, in reviews folder
 * Motoyoshi found x for
 * For temporal freezing paper, we don't know precision
 * Martini & Nakayama found X
 * Long-range alignment judgment we found little effect in HolcombeLinaresWhite09
 * Binocular rivalry waves can be slow, e.g.
 * Migraine aura glacial
 * On the other hand,
 * Don't forget Yan's relative motion result
 * Some apparently-spreading processes seem instantaneous (spokes illusion)

modeling
Werkhoven, Snippe, & Toet. First-order, second-order, etc. low-pass filter: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-pass_filter

If temporally low-pass the Reichhardt outputs, all speeds represented in speed-modulated stimulus but not in unmodulated stimulus. If temporally low-pass the pre-filtering stage,wouldn't be able to perceive motion at high frequencies If delay stage is temporally low-pass,
 * acceleration and direction alternation

refs

 * 1) HolcombeLinaresWhite09 pmid=20055542
 * 2) Melcher-etal-2004 pmid=15066396
 * 3) Holcombe2009TICS pmid=19386535