User:Esbenson:History of science in america

user:esbenson

General Science in a developing nation/at the imperial periphery Pragmatism, democracy, and popular culture
 * Bell, “Early American science” (1955)
 * Daniels, Science in American Society
 * Dennis, “Historiography of science” (1997)
 * Dupree, “The history of American science” (1966)
 * Elliott, “Forum for the History of Science in America: Identity and Organization” (1999)
 * Elliott, “Models of the American Scientist” (1982)
 * Hollinger, “Science as a weapon in Kulturkampfe” (1995)
 * Hollinger, “Free enterprise and free inquiry” (1990)
 * Reingold, “Reflections on 200 years of science” (1979)
 * Reingold, ed., Science in America since 1820 (1976)
 * Reingold, Science in nineteenth-century America (1964)
 * Rosenberg, “Science in American society” (1983)
 * Rosenberg, “Toward an ecology of knowledge” (1979)
 * Rossiter, Women Scientists in America (1982, 1995)
 * Shryock, “The need for studies” (1944)
 * Wise, “Science and Technology” (1985)
 * Bedini, Thinkers and Tinkers
 * Brigham, Public Culture in the Early Republic
 * Cohen, Science and the Founding Fathers
 * Dupree, Science and the Federal Government
 * Greene, American Science in the Age of Jefferson
 * Hindle, Pursuit of Science in Revolutionary America
 * Hindle, David Rittenhouse
 * Hindle, “A retrospective view”
 * Oleson & Brown, eds., The Pursuit of Knowledge in the Early American Republic: American Scientific and Learned Societies from Colonial Times to the Civil War
 * Sellars, Mr. Peale's Museum
 * Stearns, Science in the British Colonies of America
 * Struik, Yankee Science in the Making
 * Lurie, Louis Agassiz
 * Daniels, “The pure science ideal and democratic culture”
 * Daniels, American Science in the Age of Jackson
 * Guralnik, Science and the Ante-Bellum American College
 * Goetzmann, Army exploration
 * Goetzmann, Exploration and Empire
 * Guralnik, “Sources of misconception ...”
 * Haller, Outcasts from Evolution
 * Johnson, Scientific Interests in the Old South
 * Kohlstedt, “Curiosities and cabinets”
 * Kohlstedt, “Parlors, primers, and public schooling”
 * Miller, Dollars for Research
 * Numbers & Savitt, eds., Science and Medicine in the Old South
 * Owens, “Pure and sound government”
 * Porter, Eagle's Nest
 * Rossiter, “Benjamin Silliman”
 * Secord, Victorian Sensation
 * Sinclair, Philadelphia's Philosopher Mechanics
 * Slotten, “Science, education, and antebellum reform”
 * Stanton, Leopard's Spots

Professionalization and specialization Science, expansion, and imperialism Organization and industrialization Places, practices, material culture, and social structure Using science to reform society The militarization of American science?
 * Baatz, Knowledge, culture, and science in the metropolis
 * Barrow, Passion for Birds
 * Barrow, “Specimen dealer”
 * Bittel, “Science, suffrage, and experimentation”
 * Bruce, Launching American Science
 * Daniels, American Science in the Age of Jackson
 * Daniels, “Process of professionalization in American science”
 * Dupree, Science in the Federal Government
 * Dupree, Asa Gray
 * Fleming, Meteorology in America
 * Goldstein, “'Yours for science'”
 * James, Elites in Conflict
 * Kevles et al., “The sciences in America, circa 1880”
 * Kevles, Physicists
 * Kohlstedt, Formation of the American Scientific Community
 * Kohler, “The PhD machine”
 * Livingstone, Nathaniel Southgate Shaler
 * Lurie, Louis Agassiz
 * Midgette, To Foster the Spirit of Professionalism
 * Moyer, A Scientist's Voice in American Culture
 * Moyer, Joseph Henry
 * Nash, “Conflict between pure and applied science”
 * Olseon & Voss, eds., The Organization of Knowledge in Modern America, 1860-1920
 * Overfield, Science with Practice
 * Rainger, Benson, Maienschein, eds., The American Development of Biology
 * Reingold, “Definitions and speculations”
 * Rossiter, Emergence of Agricultural Science
 * Schneider, “Local knowledge”
 * Slotten, Patronage, Practice, and the Culture of American Science
 * Slotten, “Dilemmas of science”
 * Star & Griesemer, “Institutional ecologies”
 * Tobey, Saving the Prairies
 * Adas, Dominance by Design
 * Adas, Machines as the Measure of Men
 * Anderson, “'Where every prospect pleases ...'”
 * Anderson, “Excremental colonialism”
 * Anderson, “The trespass speaks”
 * Bieder, Science Encounters the Indian
 * Fleming, Meteorology in America
 * Goetzmann, Army exploration
 * Goetzmann, Exploration and empire
 * Haraway, “Teddy-bear patriarchy”
 * Harrison, “Science and politics”
 * Hofstatder, Social Darwinism
 * Livingstone, Nathaniel Southgate Shaler
 * Love, Race over Empire
 * Manning, Government in Science
 * Manning, U.S. Coast Survey vs. Navy Hydrographic Office
 * Pauly, “Beauty and menace”
 * Pauly, “The world and all that is in it”
 * Pauly, Biologists and the Promise of American Life
 * Slotten, Patronage
 * Worster, A River Running West
 * Aitken, Scientific Management in Action
 * Chandler, Visible Hand
 * Dennis, Accounting for Research
 * Fitzgerald, Business of Breeding
 * Geiger, To Advance Knowledge
 * Graham, R&D for Industry
 * Hart, Forged Consensus
 * Hounshell & Smith, Science and Corporate Strategy
 * Hounshell, “Edison and the pure science ideal”
 * Hughes, American Genesis
 * Klein, “Construing 'technology' as 'applied science'”
 * Kleinman, Politics on the Endless Frontier
 * Kohler, Partners in Science
 * Layton, “Mirror-image twins”
 * Lecuyer, “Academic science and technology”
 * Lecuyer, “Making of a science based technological university”
 * Noble, America by Design
 * Reich, Making of American Industrial Research
 * Reich, “Edison, Coolidge, and Langmuir”
 * Rossiter, Emergence of Agricultural Science
 * Servos, Physical Chemistry
 * Servos, “Industrial relations of science”
 * Smith, “Wallace Carothers”
 * Shapin, “Who is the industrial scientist?”
 * Wise, “Ionists in industry”
 * Wise, Willis R. Whitney
 * Anderson, “'Where every prospect pleases'”
 * Benson, “From museum research to laboratory research”
 * Capshew & Rader, “Big science”
 * Creager, Life of a Virus
 * Galison, Image and Logic
 * Galison & Hevly, eds., Big Science
 * Gusterson, Nuclear Rites
 * Hales, Atomic Spaces
 * Haraway, Primate Visions
 * Hollinger, “Free enterprise and free inquiry”
 * Kaiser, “Suburbanization”
 * Kirsch, Proving Grounds
 * Kleinman, Impure Science
 * Knorr-Cetina, Epistemic Cultures
 * Kohler, Landscapes and Labscapes
 * Kohler, “Labscapes”
 * Kohler, Lords of the Fly
 * Kohler, “Drosophila”
 * Kohler, From medical chemistry to biochemistry
 * Kohlstedt, “Curiosities and cabinets”
 * Kuletz, Tainted Desert
 * Latour & Woolgar, Laboratory Life
 * Lynch, Art and Artifact
 * Mitman, “When nature is the zoo”
 * Montgomery, “Place, practice, and primatology”
 * Owens, “Pure and sound government”
 * Pauly, “Summer resort and scientific discipline”
 * Rader, Making Mice
 * Rainger, “Constructing a landscape”
 * Shaping, “What is the industrial scientist?”
 * Star & Griesemer, “Institutional ecologies”
 * Tobey, Saving the Prairies
 * Westwick, National Labs
 * Allen, “Eugenics record office”
 * Auerbach, “Scientists in the New Deal”
 * Clarke, Disciplining Reproduction
 * Colgrove, “'Science in a democracy'”
 * Galison, “Aufbau/Bauhaus”
 * Haskell, Emergence of Professional Social Science
 * Hollinger, “Science and anarchy”
 * Kevles, In the Name of Eugenics
 * Kevles, “Testing the Army's intelligence”
 * Kimmelman, “American Breeders' Association”
 * Kloppenberg, Uncertain Victory
 * Kohler, Partners in Science
 * Kuznick, “Losing the world of tomorrow”
 * Kuznick, Beyond the Laboratory
 * Rosenberg, No Other Gods
 * Ross, Origins of American Social Science
 * Larson, Summer for the Gods
 * Larson, Sex, Race, and Science
 * Livingstone, Nathaniel Southgate Shaler
 * Mitman, State of Nature
 * Moyer, Scientist's Voice
 * Owens, “Pure and sound government”
 * Pauly, Controlling Life
 * Pauly, Biologists and the Promise of American Life
 * Pauly, “Modernist practice in American biology”
 * Rydell, “Fan dance of science”
 * Slotten, Patronage, Practice, and the Culture of American Science
 * Steel, Walter Lippman
 * Thurtle, “Harnessing heredity”
 * Tobey, American Ideology of National Science
 * Tobey, Saving the Prairies
 * van Keuren, “Science, progressivism, and military preparedness”
 * Veblen, Engineers and the Price System
 * Walter, Science and Cultural Crisis
 * Westbrook, John Dewey
 * Amadae, Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy
 * Appel, Shaping Biology
 * Bocking, “Ecosystems, ecologists, and the atom”
 * Boyer, By the Bomb's Early Light
 * Bush, Science, The Endless Frontier
 * Doel, “Constituting the postwar earth sciences”
 * Edwards, Closed World
 * Engerman, “Rethinking Cold War universities”
 * England, A Patron for Pure Science
 * Forman & Sanchez-Ron, eds., National Military Establishments
 * Forman, “Beyond quantum electronics”
 * Galison & Hevly, eds., Big Science
 * Galison, “Physics between war and peace”
 * Galison, “Ontology of the enemy”
 * Gerovitch, “Mathematical machines”
 * Gusterson, Nuclear Rites
 * Haraway, Primate Visions
 * Hewlett et al., Atomic Shield
 * Hewlett & Holl, Atoms for Peace and War
 * Kaiser, “Cold war requisitions”
 * Kevles, “Cold war and hot physics”
 * Kirsch, Proving Grounds
 * Kleinman, Politics on the Endless Frontier
 * Koistinen, “The 'industrial-military' complex”
 * Lasby, Project Paperclip
 * Latham, Modernization as Ideology
 * Leslie, Cold War and American Science
 * Lowen, Creating the Cold War University
 * MacLeod, “Strictly for the birds”
 * Mendelsohn et al., eds., Science, Technology, and the Military
 * Mukerji, Fragile Power
 * Needell, “From military research to big science”
 * Needell, “Project Troy”
 * Needell, “Lloyd Berkner”
 * Needell, Science, Cold War, and the American State
 * Noble, Forces of Production
 * Oreskes, “Laissez-tomber”
 * Oreskes, “A context of motivation”
 * Perkins, Geopolitics and the Green Revolution
 * Reingold, “Science in the Civil War”
 * Roland, “Science and war”
 * Roland, “Science, technology, and war”
 * Russell, War and Nature
 * Sapolsky, Science and the Navy
 * Sherry, In the Shadow of War
 * Solovey, “Project Camelot”
 * van Keuren, “Cold War science in black and white”
 * Weart, Discovery of Global Warming
 * Westwick, National Labs

The politics of expertise Science in a 'knowledge society'?
 * Auerbach, “Scientists in the New Deal”
 * Balogh, Chain Reaction
 * Boyer, “From activism to apathy”
 * Carson, Silent Spring
 * Compton, “Report of the Science Advisory Board”
 * Dunlap, DDT
 * Dunlap, Saving America's Wildlife
 * Englehart, End of Victory Culture
 * Fitzgerald, Every Farm a Factory
 * Greenberg, Politics of Pure Science
 * Hilgartner, Science on Stage
 * Hollinger, “Science as a weapon in Kulturkampfe”
 * Jasanoff, Fifth Estate
 * Jasanoff, Science at the Bar
 * Kaiser, “Atomic secret in red hands?”
 * Kaiser, “Nuclear democracy”
 * Kargon & Hodes, “Karl Compton”
 * Kevles, “George Ellery Hale”
 * Kevles, Physicists
 * Kirsch, Proving Grounds
 * Kleinman, “Layers of interest, layers of influence”
 * Kuznick, Beyond the Laboratory
 * Light, From Warfare to Welfare
 * Mackenzie & Spinardi, “Tacit knowledge”
 * Merton, Sociology of Science
 * Mirowski, Machine Dreams
 * Mirowski, “Cyborg agonistes”
 * Mooney, Republican War on Science
 * Needell, Science, Cold War, and the American State
 * Numbers, Creationists
 * O'Neill, Firecracker Boys
 * Popper, The Open Society
 * Rudolph, Scientists in the Classroom
 * Schrecker, No Ivory Tower
 * Schweber, In the Shadow of the Bomb
 * Scott, Seeing Like a State
 * Shaping, “Who is the industrial scientist?”
 * Slayton, “Speaking as scientists”
 * Solovey, “Project Camelot”
 * Thackray, “Reflections on the decline of science”
 * Thorpe, “Disciplining experts”
 * Wang, “Science, security, and the cold war”
 * Wang, American science in an age of anxiety
 * Wisnioski, “Inside 'the system'”
 * Zachary, Endless Frontier
 * Castells, Rise of the Network Society
 * Epstein, Impure Science
 * Etzkowitz, “Second academic revolution”
 * Etzkowitz, “Bridging the gap”
 * Fujumura, Crafting Science
 * Gusterson, “The death of the authors of death”
 * Helmreich, Silicon Second Nature
 * Kevles, Physicists
 * Keller, Making Sense of Life
 * Kleinman, Impure Cultures
 * Kleinman, “Science, capitalism, and the rise of the 'knowledge worker'”
 * Kleinman, “Untangling context”
 * Kloppenberg, First the Seed
 * Knorr-Cetina, Epistemic Cultures
 * Rabinow, Making PCR
 * Thackray, ed., Private Science
 * Williams, Retooling