User:Andy Maloney/Notebook/Lab Notebook of Andy Maloney/2009/09/28

{| width="800"
 * style="background-color: #EEE"|[[Image:Chef2.png|128px]] Lab Notebook of Andy Maloney
 * style="background-color: #F2F2F2" align="center"|  |Main project page
 * style="background-color: #F2F2F2" align="center"|  |Main project page


 * colspan="2"|
 * colspan="2"|

Ethics course

 * I don't understand this but we are going to talk about neuroscience ethics. Why? This is supposed to be a course on nano ethics.
 * here he goes again on Nazi stuff
 * communitarian
 * generalizable
 * moral gravitas - didn't realize I'm in a Latin class
 * he's going over autonomy again
 * talking again about Nazis
 * he said utilize
 * look up Nuremberg and Tuskegee
 * parentas
 * Apparently people can remotely log into this class and ask questions. Why am here? Is attendence taken?
 * principle of double effect
 * aquiescing
 * formulaic
 * profer
 * why do we keep talking about medical ethics? I actually feel sorry for all the medical doctors if they had to go through this class.
 * wexelblat effects
 * he likes to say fiduciary
 * injurious
 * not sure why but we seem to be going over mechanisms to protect patients. Still nothing about nanoscience.
 * he said utilizing
 * not sure why but he's talking about something with a federal code "fed. Reg. 56 cfr 28002" I do not understand why.
 * so as a joke at the beginning of the class, this guy put a bust of someone to the camera. I thought that only movies stereotyped brainy people as having busts of people. I don't think I have ever come across a real person that owns a bust.
 * look up the irb
 * I must admit that this class was structured better. There was lots of examples. Unfortunately none of the examples were geared towards nanoscience.


 * }