DataONE:Notebook/ArticleCitationPractices/2010/07/08

{| width="800"
 * style="background-color: #EEE"|[[Image:owwnotebook_icon.png|128px]] Project name
 * style="background-color: #F2F2F2" align="center"|  |Main project page
 * style="background-color: #F2F2F2" align="center"|  |Main project page


 * colspan="2"|
 * colspan="2"|

July 8 Knoxville Meeting Notes
{| width="800"
 * style="background-color: #cdde95;" align="center"|
 * style="background-color: #cdde95;" align="center"|




 * align="center" style="background-color: #e5edc8;" |

title=Search this Project


 * colspan="2" style="background-color: #F2F2F2;" align="right"|Customize your entry pages 
 * colspan="2"|
 * colspan="2"|
 * colspan="2"|

meeting with heather

 * mondrian, many eyes, pentaho for data visualization
 * data sharing unit of analysis = article regression data shared vs. produced (score way and # sets too)
 * data reuse unit of analysis = dataset (multiple per article)
 * look at each data type seperately
 * explore each component of score in a regression (divide "ok") - 1. did they mention author?, 2. etc.
 * or maybe just y/n - good = author or accesssion (b/c citation is still useful); bad = depository only or not indicated
 * this means that YN depository could be factor beyond depository type --> do repository get more reuse than other reuses?
 * analysis types
 * regression- primarily ordinal (R Mass polr), some logistic
 * frank harold regression
 * clustering (do good/bad citations sepearate and by what factor)
 * factors: YN depository, Depository type, year, journal, funder,
 * journal breakdown report (separate manu/editorial/letter to the editor/blog/poster)
 * percent reuse
 * data types and depositories used
 * plus best practices suggestions
 * especially with the advent of new policies, should evaluate concerns brought up by this

Morning Breakout

 * Nic's data
 * Journal Fields of Interest
 * Data Management Plan YN
 * Date of Data Plan (management/sharing)--dates seem to be incorrecttis
 * Data Required
 * OA
 * Accession number required
 * Place of depository
 * Funders field of Interest
 * Funder of Journal Articles (Top Ten to 25 funders for my target journals)
 * Type
 * Overall advice
 * Column by column metadata
 * Google fusion tables
 * People can comment on data but not change it
 * Visualization capabilities
 * OWW discussion
 * Caveats on OWW and SS
 * credit
 * intentions, please be respectful of publication plans
 * undergoing QA/QC
 * link SS back to DataONE/OWW
 * we should make a list of what the plone is not doing
 * to try
 * Delicious
 * Connotea
 * CiteULike

Overall Wrapup

 * reminder about report: paragraph summary with headshot
 * reminder about midterm survey


 * }